spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-27-06 09:44 AM
Original message |
NPR: 45 day port review is so Bush* can save face...WTF?? |
|
I was under the impression that the 45 day review of the Dubai World deal was to scrutinize the plan for security reasons. This morning on NPR after a fluff piece on Tom DeLay, the news proclaimed that the 45 day review period was so our esteemed Pretzelnut can Save Face. How Nice of Congress to oblige. P.S. He has no face to save.
|
gratuitous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-27-06 09:46 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Silly me! I thought the 45 day review was mandatory BY LAW |
|
Which means that, once again, the corrupt Bush administration broke the law.
|
DS1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-27-06 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. and it should have happened BEFORE approval, no? |
|
doesn't make sense to have a review after the fact
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-27-06 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
8. They are closing the deal on Thursday of this week. So what's the point. |
rox63
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-27-06 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
But * will use it for another purpose, to twist enough rethug arms in Congress to approve it, despite the fact that their constituents are screaming their objections at them.
|
mdmc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-27-06 09:48 AM
Response to Original message |
2. this deal will be kosher to all free traders in 45 days |
|
then what will the flip floppin dems do?
|
FearofFutility
(764 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-27-06 09:50 AM
Response to Original message |
|
DPW has ASKED for a review and Bush has ACCEPTED it. At least that's how my paper has reported it.
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-27-06 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
10. Their advisors 'americans all' told them to ask for the reviews. |
|
What could Bush* say, it's to save his political ass.
|
FearofFutility
(764 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-27-06 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
13. Of course it's to save his political ass |
|
We're supposed to believe that a company that believed it was already a done deal turns around and asks for further review? :eyes: It was the other way around. "Uh, guys? We have a little problem. Can we hold this off for 45 days and do another "security review"? There is a big shit storm here and I need time to clean it up."
|
ThomWV
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-27-06 09:50 AM
Response to Original message |
6. And Then It Will Be Approved |
|
No matter how much the people of this country wish it not to be so.
|
The Backlash Cometh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-27-06 09:51 AM
Response to Original message |
7. Have you figured out what they mean by "save face?" |
|
Is it because this thing is going to get dismantled and they're trying to do it slowly within the 45 days? Or is it because Bush said there would be no review and the Dubai Ports World gave him an out by saying they wanted one?
|
zanne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-27-06 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. When the next terrorist attack happens in this country... |
|
I wonder who the people will blame?
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-27-06 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. The democrats for not stopping the sale. You watch. |
bunkerbuster1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-27-06 10:01 AM
Response to Original message |
12. "he doesn't need any FACE." |
|
quoting Poppy Bush, here, although of course Poppy was speaking of Saddam Hussein.
One of the few truly (and intentionally) funny things the Elder Bush uttered.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:05 PM
Response to Original message |