Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sen. Warner is up on C-Span2 discussing the Port Deal!!! HEADS UP!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 02:24 PM
Original message
Sen. Warner is up on C-Span2 discussing the Port Deal!!! HEADS UP!!
Edited on Mon Feb-27-06 02:26 PM by FLDem5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Schumer Up now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. 'we will STILL be introducing our legislation this afternoon'
"CFIUS conducts a full thorough and independant investigation"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. Please keep the info coming for a cuberat
Can't access it myself right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pearl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. I just called his office
Said he was an apologist for the WH and gave it to them.
oooh so worried about the Arab World sensitivities.
We round up Arabs all over the world,
invade in the middle east based on a lie.
torture and mayhem throughout the middle east and

now we're sooo worried about the "bias"
What Shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. "is CFIUS structured properly in a Post 9/11 world"
hahahaha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Was that from Schumer?
If so, both he and Hillary are kicking butt at throwing the "Post 9/11" mem back in their faces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Yes! It was him
Warner was only up for a minute pushing the deal, the rest has all been Schumer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Good going - this needs to be said this way.
Thanks for posting this thread, FLDem5.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. New Republican spin point: Warner just said UAE will increase security at
Edited on Mon Feb-27-06 02:34 PM by IsItJustMe
the port if UAE takes over.

That really settles my nerves. Boy!

Warner also stated: Why would the UAE put so much money in a port and allow the security to be comprimised.

My reply: Could be many reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. * already said he would veto any attempt to stop it. So now what happens
if information comes out in this 45 day investigation that is negative to wards this deal?

I already know the answer: More Orwellian spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. "will the investigation be independent - can they have an open mind"
"if the report is kept secret, and only open to the President, what good will the report be??"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. Schumer will kick some ass. Warner is just too damed predictable.
Bush* could be caught with his pecker in his pet goat and Warner would have a wise old view of it all, never blaming the 'selected' one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. "Old wise view" LOL
I swear Warner practices "Senator" in front of the mirror at night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. any man who was Liz Taylor's 15th husband has a judgement problem, imo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Hush! Today's her birthday!
(She's my idol! LOL!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. "the president has not said he has an open mind"
"I think the report should be made available to the Senate and the HOuse and the non-classified part should be made public"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. 3rd question: Evaluation
there ought to be an... ability for this body and the other body to disapprove of this deal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. the Legislation want Congress to be able to DISAPPROVE of this deal.
Edited on Mon Feb-27-06 02:34 PM by FLDem5
Yes. It is being presented by 5 (R) and 5 (D)

S2333 is the Bill number.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. Someone needs to cut through...
the spin put out by repigs.

If the UAE is an important ally in *'s war against terror (snigger), it should remain so regardless of the whether the port deal goes through... unless the government of UAE is blackmailing the U.S.

Would Great Britain declare the U.S. an enemy if an American company won a contract over a British company? Of course not, so stop the bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
14. "how much is the American part of the port area walled off"
Still Schumer.

I don't quite understand that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. it would probably get a Veto-Proof majority - Oh no he did not!! HA!
That is great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
18. "amendment after amendment after amendment that I and others
have brought to the floor in the past (re: port security) have been voted down, usually down party lines"

Anyone know if that is true?? That would be a KILLER issue in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. I know Patty Murray has been pressing hard on this issue for some time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
21. looks like that is it. Floor yielded
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pearl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. "War on Freedom"
Hey guys, Did you hear Warner claim there is a War on Freedom.
He probably meant to say War for Freedom but he inadvertently let
the truth slip. I wonder if Crooks and Liars might have captured it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
23. More weakness from Dems, it seems to me.
Edited on Mon Feb-27-06 03:00 PM by WinkyDink
Harry Reid sounds more milquetoast than Percy Dovetonsils. Test-driving the slogan "Dangerous Incompetence".

Smaller syllables, Harry. And more BRUTAL words than "incompetence".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC