Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I Really wanted to see what bush* would do if his veto was over-ridden

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 04:14 PM
Original message
I Really wanted to see what bush* would do if his veto was over-ridden
We now can be fairly certain that Congress is using this 45 waiting period on the ports deal to ensure that they will not be hurt politically for selling out on our national security. With Frist and some other puke heavy weights sounding as though they are going to back bush*, we may not have enough votes to over-ride bush*s veto.

I am *really* curious to see what the idiot king would do if Congress blocked him. I don't have any doubt that he would go ahead with the deal anyway, I just want to know how he would do it. I want to see how the public will react when he (once again) pisses on Congress, the American people, and the Constitution and claims his inherent urinary powers allows him to do what ever he likes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. How Will This Play Out?.....
After the 45 day period - if Congress passes a law prohibiting this deal and * vetos it - how many votes are needed to override *'s veto?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. 2/3ds majority vote of the members present (not the total) in each chamber
Edited on Mon Feb-27-06 04:21 PM by Richardo
"Overriding a presidential veto requires a two-thirds majority vote of the members present and voting (in other words, those who are actually in the chamber rather than two-thirds of the total) in each chamber."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I'm not sure about the number needed to over-ride the veto
Edited on Mon Feb-27-06 04:26 PM by me b zola

Right now it seems as though bush* et.al are leaning heavily on the pubs in Congress, and it seems as though they are using the 45 days to have their talking points drummed into every sheep's head to ensure the pubs that they will not be hurt politically for backing the deal.


edited to say that someone has posted the correct number needed to over-ride the veto. (I was wrong :blush: )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Schumer was suppose to bring a bill to the floor.
The Democrats would be foolish not to play this out to the end. They need to keep banging this away every day so the Republicans can't say that people lost interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. maybe the dems need to remind the republicans about 911
Edited on Mon Feb-27-06 04:19 PM by cal04
since they haven't used it in a couple of days maybe we should remind them
repeat word for word to them the VERY same lines they give to them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. first he would have to find the VETO stamp
the only stamp he can find at the moment says "OTEV" on it...

but seriously - he'll do one of two things should the legislation hit his desk

1. he'll veto it and then issue an executive order to go ahead with the deal before it can be overridden in congress. This will stir up a hornets nest, congress will be scrambling for law books and meanwhile Dubai will be running the ports

2. he'll sign it and then issue a "signing statement" EXCLUDING Dubai from it and spin it as a "grandfather clause" type thingy. This will stir up a hornets nest, congress will be scrambling for law books and meanwhile Dubai will be running the ports
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. He Might Get Angry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Reichstag fire indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. If it were clear that Congress would counter the veto, Bush would not veto
Edited on Mon Feb-27-06 04:55 PM by Marr
The Administration would make up some excuse for putting the deal aside if that were the case. They want to hand everything to their cronies, yes- but authoritarians depend heavily on theater, and they cannot afford to look weak.

Privately- I have no idea what he'd do. He might throw a fit, or he might not. I don't know if he personally really gives a shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
f-bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. he'd sulk, pout, start another war with somebody and then.....
Edited on Mon Feb-27-06 05:05 PM by f-bush
try to rewrite the constitution, as soon as everybody's mind is off the ports, then he would slip it through!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. this works better for dems, cause they've embedded
fear/hatred of brown people from the Middle East into the sheeple with exquisite effectiveness, and NOTHING they can say will wash those feelings away

anybody in a close race who votes for this deal will pay a price

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. I don't know. This will be interesting to see.
Edited on Mon Feb-27-06 08:12 PM by Independent_Liberal
I'm as curious as anybody else. I guess only time will tell. Until then, your guess is as good as mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. I don't think he'd veto if it was going to be overturned
they'd get enough republicans in line first, by hook or by crook
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC