Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NBC confirms it's investigating whether Bush spied on CNN's Christiane Ama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Rosco T. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 01:22 AM
Original message
NBC confirms it's investigating whether Bush spied on CNN's Christiane Ama
http://americablog.blogspot.com/2006/01/nbc-confirms-its-investigating-whether.html

NBC confirms it's investigating whether Bush spied on CNN's Christiane Amanpour
by John in DC - 1/04/2006 10:27:00 PM

That is the only way to read NBC's just-issued statement on why they deleted key portions of Andrea Mitchell's interview after we reported on it here earlier today.

(snip)

Unfortunately this transcript was released prematurely. It was a topic on which we had not completed our reporting, and it was not broadcast on 'NBC Nightly News' nor on any other NBC News program. We removed that section of the transcript so that we may further continue our inquiry.

This is quite big. Note exactly what NBC said.

- NBC did not say it pulled the references to Bush spying on Amanpour because it was inappropriate conjecture about something which Andrea Mitchell had no evidence.

- No, NBC said it pulled the references because it was still investigating the accusation and didn't want to scoop itself before it was finished investigating. And make no mistake, NBC is "continuing their inquiry."

(snip)

NBC has acknowledged that they have information to suggest that Bush may have spied (be spying) on CNN's Christiane Amanpour and that NBC is currently investigating that very possibility. This isn't just conjecture anymore, NBC has confirmed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Confirms" according to AMERICAblog.
For the sake of clarity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
70. It's all part of Bush's "incompetence and ineffectivenss" war strategery
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well, she does talk kinda funny. And she's married to a hater of America
Bush is obligated to keep us safe, so I certainly approve of his spying on her. Or is that a non sequitur?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Cannon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
64. I lay awake every night FEARING a Christiane Amanpour attack.
Edited on Thu Jan-05-06 02:21 PM by Frank Cannon
I literally lay in my bed bathing in a cold sweat, shivering in terror that Christiane Amanpour IS GOING TO KILL US ALL!

Thank GOD our wonderful President is FINALLY doing something about this terrible threat to our National security!! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. I want to know how Andrea KNEW that Christiane
had been wiretapped??? Who told her???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Could Andrea Mitchell and Christiane Amanpour be friends
or friendly collegues?

Maybe Amanpour was suspicious. She's extremely sharp.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
18. Perhaps, but I have a feeling AM got this info from the same conduit
...from the WH that fed her the Plame info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
20. Personally, I find them to be politically polarized.
Amanpour encapsulates the knowledge for knowledge's sake; Mitchell is married to the money.

If Mitchell comes out with Amanpour it's because the liberals now have something to snowball to uncover whether other journalists, including conservative ones, were also wiretapped. For instance, we already know that William Saffire was wiretapped, what if Rove wanted to make sure that his conservative pundits stayed in line? Mitchell knows she won't be able to get the Republicans behind any investigations, but what if she gives the Dems something they can sink their teeth into?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #20
51. I think it's Andrea Mitchell alerting her conservative friends that
NBC NEws has something on them---in a "safe" way. After all, she and hubby are friends with the Cheneys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #51
56. But that's the part that I don't get.
If Andrea prematurely revealed NBC's hand, wouldn't NBC retaliate against her for her indiscretion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #56
71. '...longtime analyst of the intelligence community.'
""As a longtime analyst of the intelligence community, Mitchell has reported on Osama Bin Laden and his al-Qaida network for “Nightly News with Tom Brokaw” since 1996. Her past assignments for NBC have included traveling to North Korea, Afghanistan, the Middle East, Bosnia, Kosovo, Pakistan and Haiti."" from the NBC official bio

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3688874/

Scrutinize this with your scrutinizers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #71
76. Okay, loaded question time.
What church does Mitchell and Greenspan attend?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #76
77. Alan Greenspan is Jewish, so synagogue may be more appropriate
Edited on Thu Jan-05-06 04:57 PM by EVDebs
for him. I don't know about Andrea, who may just prefer to sleep in Sundays.

http://www.nndb.com/people/551/000050401/ for Andrea

http://www.nndb.com/people/164/000023095/ for Alan

Maybe we can get a real rise outta her. Someone ask her what she knows about Task Force 121 and domestic spying...Your question will become more relevant re church attendance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #20
52. Yes, I agree.
They do seem very different in the way they handle their respective jobs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #20
62. What is Andrea's background? Is she Lebanese-American?
Mitchell is a very common name (Senator George, e.g.) from those parts (as is Thomas; e.g. Helen and Danny). She would have in common with Amanpour, in that case, ancestry in rather cultured and highly developed nations (CA is Iranian-Brit) that are involved in the greater Middle Eastern/Southwest Asian brouhahas, as well as both being reporters (didn't AM do foreign work primarily before she married?) and both having Jewish American husbands who have served in government.

A few points of convergence, anyway!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #20
78. Didn't Andrea say that Valerie Plame's name was widely known or something
like that and then claim she was confused later ? Is she a natural blond ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #78
80. You're right. She's already proven to be a misinformer when it's
beneficial to Bush. So I guess it is possible she's giving them a warning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
69. Wayne Madsen's article on Operation First Fruits may have named names
somewhere. From what I've read they were mostly Washington based journalists. But they fit the profile: anyone who criticizes our fearless leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. Bill & Hillary Clinton talk to overseas countries daily
Is W automatically picking up on their conversations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
6. Bush should resign now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ItsTheMediaStupid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
53. I'd prefer ritual suicide on national TV
But I'd settle for a resignation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
83. Someone Oughta Call the Cops!
Me: Hi, I want to report a crime.

911: Ok. What's the location?

Me: The Oval office... need I say more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
7. He's protecting everyone from terror!! Honest!! He wouldn't lie!
If Bush were a certain wooden puppet boy, his nose would be half way around the world by now.

I have no doubt they spied on her. In fact, I'd bet they did.

They spied on UN delegates just to find out how they might vote on Iraq. She's in contact with those who do not approve of Bush and his war. Sure they spied on her.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. You know, that would make an excellent cartoon drawing for
the Sunday Washington Post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ubdumbo Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-08-06 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #7
89. If Bush were a certain wooden puppet boy
(Speaking of WOOD) I would LOVE for you to name just ONE politian who has not "lied" while in office.!! You most certainly could NOT post Clinton's name.... Or any other past President's name for that matter.!! It's just the American way !! Sad, but TRUE!!!. Every time I read these comments, It blows my mind !! Where or when did we become so divided as a country, And for what reasons? ARE WE NOT, THE UNITED states of America?? Anyone who totally believes/has faith in one party or the other, REALLY NEEDS TO HAVE THEIR HEAD EXAMINED>!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-08-06 03:27 AM
Response to Reply #89
90. oh, so it's the American way?
maybe it's the American way to steal the treasury and send our sons, daughters, fathers, mothers to the misery of war with a LIE---a pray Bush would have just lied about a BJ instead of damaging this country and shredding the Constitution and Bill of Rights!!!! Of course sometimes, he doesn't lie, he just doesn't answer the question and gets away with it. Sir, have you ever used drugs? "Well, I don't want to answer that because it might influence the kids." Let's see, they laughed at Clinton when he admitted trying pot once, but didn't inhale, but our media just let teflon boy slide by. Blatant insider trading over 800,000.00. Mr. Bush what about your business dealings and the claim of insider trading? "Well, let me tell you my mother-in-law lost money on that." That's it, no going after the truth, just let him slide. And, that's before the first election. Since then, he attempted to stall a 9/11 investigation, excluded pages from the Iraq WMD report before it went to the UN, lied us grievously into a war, Cheney has held a secret energy committee and refuses disclose the content-(of course, I could probably tell you the content, it was the oil companies splitting up Iraq), they censor the truth of what's really happening in Iraq, and at every turn coerce and bully the press to repeat their spin. Let me know if Clinton did all of that. And, he has appointed incompetent cronies in key positions, has bullied and bribed people in his own party to pass pro-corporate fat cat bills, he choses his wealthy, some corrupt friends, over the majority of American people. I could go on and on--don't tell me every politician has sold the American people down the river like this administration has done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-08-06 03:28 AM
Response to Reply #90
91. oh, and one more thing
Al Gore did not say he invented the internet, but the "liberal" media kept spinning and laughing that he had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-08-06 03:32 AM
Response to Reply #89
92. well Clinton paid a price for lying about a blow job
Edited on Sun Jan-08-06 03:38 AM by notadmblnd
still no one died as a result of it. I don't care if the politician is left right or center. When the politicians lies result in the death of 10's if not hundreds of thousands of innocent people, that politician deserves to be dealt with.

What is it about some people's God Bush, that causes them to be unable to see the ugly truth?

on edit: enjoy your stay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. Could Andrea's question be a tip-off to the administration?
Her way of letting the Powers That Be know that NBC is investigating the wire-tapping of Christiane Amanpour? I just don't trust this woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #8
21. YES. That's exactly what she did. She's a shill for the right.
She knew they were still investigating the story and leaked it ON PURPOSE to tip off the regime to get their spy papers on Christiane SHREDDED, ASAP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. Not so fast.
If Bitchell was going to tip the admin she wouldn't do it through a semi-public forum. She'd do it personally. This shark swims in the same waters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #25
35. I disagree. I think she blind-sided NBC on purpose.
She KNEW they were investigating this and were not ready to go public. Why else would she do it? Do you think she did it as a favor to Christiane? I don't. OR are you saying NBC wanted it out to tip-off the regime and instead of going behind closed doors like the NYT did, they had her leak it? That doesn't make sense. This was NOT an accident. This was deliberate....on her part, for whatever reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #35
87. My best guess.
Bitchell is stupid. She let it slip. Not everything is nefarious.

She mixed up the bullshit that she's supposed to report with the bullshit that she's not supposed to report. C'mon! We're talking about Scamdrea Bitchell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
10. didn't want to scoop itself? So why the fuck did they broadcast it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosco T. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. apparently that segment wasn't broadcast... n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
72. Check post #71 and watch what she DOES not what she SAYS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
12. If you recall CNN news chief reprimanded Amanpour for her remarks
Edited on Thu Jan-05-06 01:55 AM by PA Democrat
about how she felt CNN had caved into pressure from the Bush White House to slant their coverage of the Iraq invasion. If Bush would exert pressure on CNN, I would not be surprised if they wiretapped Amanpour for revealing this.


CNN news chief Jim Walton had a “private conversation” with reporter Christiane Amanpour after she accused her own network of being “intimidated” in its coverage of the Iraqi war.
Amanpour, a guest on last week’s “Topic A with Tina Brown” on CNBC, set off shockwaves in the TV world over the weekend when she said she thought her employer, CNN, was “muzzled” in its war coverage by a combination of the White House and its competitive position with the higher-rated Fox News Channel.

“I think the press was muzzled, and I think the press self-muzzled,” she said. “I’m sorry to say that, but certainly television and, perhaps, to a certain extent, my station, was intimidated by the administration and its foot soldiers at Fox News.”

http://www.theworldaroundyou.com/2003/09/16/christiane_amanpour_reprimanded/

Edited because I can't type.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Foot soldiers at Faux News
I knew they had integrity wise lost their journalist status when the joined this branch (Faux News) of the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. she's also of middle eastern descent, isn't she?
middle eastern, spoke about something the bush's would rather remain unspoken, and conveniently married to a Democratic adviser. What's not to bug?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Iranian American
if I remember correctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #16
26. Actually she was born in England to an Iranian family.
She came to the US to go to school at the University of Rhode Island.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #26
47. She was JFK Jr.'s roomate while in college! Lucky girl! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #47
88. roommate???? link?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #26
63. Her dad was a bigwig at Iran Air n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
73. Yes, remember CNN and PsyOps dustup...
An ongoing scandal that was pushed under the carpet in 'wartime'

www.counterpunch.org/cnnpsyops.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
15. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Im with Rosey Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
17. It would be great
I hope it is true, but I'm not sure we should believe that there will really be a serious investigation. I'm not trying to be negative, I just think we should be careful about our expectations about any type of investigation. Remember that NBC is the home of Tweety and Timmy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #17
45. Don't forget, though, it's also the home of KO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
19. She is married to a Democratic congressman
Did they listen in on his communications too?

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. Jamie Rubin is a Congressman?
Jamie use to work for Clinton, but I didn't know he was a Congressman. I don't think he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. My mistake. I was thinking of some one else. My apologies n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glimmer of Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #22
29. Does anyone know what he is currenty doing?
I think he advised Clark during his campaign and then ended up with Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #29
33. Not since the campaign. I haven't seen him anywhere lately.
I do believe they live in London now. I don't know what he's up to these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #29
37. Yes, he ended up being Kerry's foreign policy advisor
in the campaign. Sounds like an "electronic" way to break into DNC headquarters, don't you think? Can anyone say "e-watergate?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #22
30. Amanpour's husband Rubin advised John Kerry in last campaign


n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #30
50. Hmmmm...This sounds like if it is looked into we might find domestic
political spying as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #50
74. TIA now offshore, privatized in Bahamas with Ben H. Bell III's company
Global Information Group, Ltd.
www.zmetro.com/archives/000901.php

Along with...

Total Surveillance
http://www.motherjones.com/interview/2005/12/albrecht.h...

Couple this insidious technology with purposely erroneous background checks...

Who is checking the background checkers?
http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/1128/p13s02-wmgn.html

Voila ! If BushCo wants to go after Dems and Greens and DUers and other such non-PC types as they designate, simply make sure those troublemakers are fired (without cause of course) and make sure the databases ChoicePoint and others such providers to the system includes incorrect data on you.

Why then Cheney's "vision" of the future will be complete. And dittoheads around the world will cheer. Makes you wonder, since there's a 6' tall Arab on kidney dialysis whom they can't seem to track...yet they CAN track that pair of underware you just bought at Wal-Mart...makes you wonder, doesn't it ?

"You have no privacy. Get over it." --Scott McNeely, CEO, Sun Microsystems The corallary of this is you have no 1st and 4th Amendments of the Bill of Rights anymore, get over it. No, I think I'll fight back if you don't mind, Scott.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #30
61. bingo
We have a winner.

bush was spying on Kerry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #61
75. On EVERYBODY ! The NSA's method is a 'vacuum' it up approach
that requires all the data to be offshored and out of US legal jurisdictions if there is to be any 'blowback' and resulting legal repercussions. Look into TIA and Ben H. Bell's company Global Information Group, Ltd., based in the Bahamas.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rniel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
24. This is just going to keep popping up again and again
They said they only spied on Al Queda then when things like this turn up we have to challenge them on it each time. Are these people enemies too??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
27. Amanpour is married to Kerry advisor Jamie Rubin. So
Edited on Thu Jan-05-06 09:42 AM by marylanddem

Is it possible that they were in reality tapping Jamie Rubin conversations???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indie_voter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #27
55. Americablog take on this
consider the implications of tapping Christiane Amanpour's phones:

1. Such a wiretap would likely include her home, office, and cell phones, and email correspondence, at the very least.

2. That means anyone Christiane has conversed with in the past four years, at least by phone or email, could have had their conversation taped by the US government.

3. That also means that anyone who uses any of Christiane's telephones or computers (work or home) could also have had their conversation bugged.

4. This includes Christiane's husband, former Clinton administration senior official Jamie Rubin, who was spokesman for the State Department.

5. Jamie Rubin was also chief foreign policy adviser to General Wesley Clark's presidential campaign, and then worked as a senior national security adviser to John Kerry's presidential campaign.

6. Did Jamie Rubin ever use his home phone, his wife's work phone, his wife's cell phone, her home computer or her work computer to communicate with John Kerry or Wesley Clark? If so, those conversations would have been bugged if Bush was tapping Amanpour.

7. Did Jamie Rubin ever in the past four years communicate with any elected officials in Washington, DC - any Senators or members of the US House? Any senior members of the Democratic party?

8. Has Rubin spoken with Bill Clinton, his former boss, in the past 4 years?

Now you understand how potentially broad a violation of privacy the Bush doctrine on illegal domestic spying really is. Everyone who's anyone is a degree or two of separation away from a terrorist.



http://americablog.blogspot.com/2006/01/what-it-means-to-john-kerry-wesley.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
28. Why should I "Make no mistake"?
Who is "Americablog" and what makes them any more credible than NBC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-08-06 03:52 AM
Response to Reply #28
93. you've been here for 39,000 + posts
Edited on Sun Jan-08-06 03:52 AM by notadmblnd
and have never heard of Americablog with John Aravosis? How can that be?

www.americablog.com
http://www.wiredstrategies.com/aravosis.htm
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=John_Aravosis

as the poster said make no mistake....

John and Americablog are very credible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
31. Interestingly, I remember reading that Amanpour was a dear
Edited on Thu Jan-05-06 10:21 AM by AzDar
friend of JFK jr.; I believe I read that they had at some point attended school together, and had remained close after.

On edit: They apparently shared a house together off the Brown U. campus; although Amanpour attented U. of Rhode Island.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
32. Why is DU not surprised - insert sarcasm here....
How many more people will up as being tapped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
34. This is one more straw...
Spying on journalists? I don't think that will be easy to spin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
36. I say good for you Mr. Cedar Combat Fighter. You are just crying
to get kicked out of the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #36
66. LOL. "Mr. Cedar Combat Fighter". That's good. And fwiw, I think Andrea's
statement was a freudian slip. I'd wager that she feels Christiane is a "terrorist sympathizer" and a threat to national security...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DirtyDawg Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
38. The Real Reason...Search for Whistle Blowers
...don't know if this was speculated in the above comments, but it does seem entirely in keeping with bushco's, and Republicans in general, behavior that the primary motivation for all this wiretapping crap is to find out just who all these people are that won't keep their mouths shut about the 'evildoing'. Hell, wasn't that the main thing Nixon and his WH henchmen were about that brought about his ultimate downfall? They just won't learn..they'll deny it right up until their Impeachment hearings...and probably not even then. They are relentless and they've got about a third of Americans willing to believe that whatever they do is 'good for 'merica'...although, in Red-Georgia, I've just read that the number is still above 50 percent. God, who are these people and how do you allow them to continue to draw breath?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DirtyDawg Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. PS...
...Sy Hersh better start using smoke signals and carrier pigeons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
40. NBC better take this to the streets ASAP. Amanpour was one of
the best journalists on the beat before she was muzzled by CNN and the other lackeys for Bush Co.

It makes me sick, sick in the pit of my gut to see how the corporate US media have been bent over for Bush Co. My trust and faith in the free press have been irrevocably and completely lost. Nothing but $$$ grubbing boot lickers. Paul Joseph Goebbels would be proud. Hitlers vision of world conquest has been re-incarnated through the illegitimate Bush Co. with help of the press whores in the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indie_voter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #40
54. Agreed. MHO, the media is the real problem
Had they done their jobs this last decade, we wouldn't be in this mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
41. I hope you're right
That could just mean, "We didn't mean for you to see that." We won't know unless more comes out about their investigation. I wouldn't put it past them to let it die quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
42. Stephanie Miller has got to be reading DU
While I was in the midst of reading the links, she started talking about the exact stories. Coincidence? I don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #42
43. They sited the source as our source Daily Kos, but I am with you
it is like Jim Ward is reading our threads, kinda cool if you ask me, they also made/make several references to the amount of research(Tweety story) that goes on with internet and blogs and that could be a DU reference as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #43
46. Exactly -- she could have gotten to the DailyKos links
from here. I think it's pretty cool, too. We already know she reads the KOEB threads and has quoted from them from time to time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #42
60. I wonder where she got those stories & links?
:rofl:

who ever it is I am sure he is good looking, smart, a great lover,
a good cook, and very humble.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=315x8271

I think his picture is on post #3.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
44. The Chilling and Killing of Free Press in America. Here we go.
Maybe it's cause she has a forun sounding name????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
48. Is anybody else wondering if the Bush spying game goes beyond
mere wiretaps and into the realm of bugging the HOMES of their enemies (ie listening to their household conversations)??? I put ABSOLUTELY NOTHING past these fascists. You know how easy it is for them to do this now with all the high tech devices. They can hear conversations just from window glass vibrations, using laser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #48
49. pssst...PATRIOT ACT! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peanutbrittle Donating Member (605 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #48
58. Yep...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #48
67. given the inanity of the average conversation in my house
Edited on Thu Jan-05-06 03:32 PM by gkhouston
in the past 5 years, I almost hope they've wasted their time bugging us. Yeah, burn your time listening to hours and hours of "Do you need to go potty?" "Honey, can you find my ...?" and "Well, if we went to the grocery tonight instead of tomorrow, then..." :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #67
86. If they bugged me, a single woman with two cats,
all they would hear is "Hey Eddie", "Mummy is a beautiful kitty, yes she is", "How's kitties?", "How's my babyness?" and other such drivvel, repeated endlessly. And lots of keyboard tapping. And the TV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onefortheroad Donating Member (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
57. Cool...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. are we having fun yet?
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #59
79. Not until we put THEIR brand of govt in the bathtub and drown it !
With apologies to Grover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fla Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
65. You better believe there is wide spread wire tapping. With Cheney,
Rummy, Scooter, Rove, Card, Wolfowitz and Bush hating the establishment, the press, and Democrats in general, I would be surprised if they didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
68. While they're at it, they might want to look into ....
Edited on Thu Jan-05-06 03:49 PM by EVDebs
Total Surveillance
http://www.motherjones.com/interview/2005/12/albrecht.h ...

Couple this insidious technology with purposely erroneous background checks

Who is checking the background checkers?
http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/1128/p13s02-wmgn.html

They've offshored, outsourced, and privatized TIA. Now all they have to do is fire you for being 'of the wrong political party' and put false information in your background data...and voila ! You've just created the most insidious terror project in the US ever.

TIA was outsourced, offshored and privatized to Global Information Group Ltd. of the Bahamas. It's run by Ben H. Bell III, a 'former' intelligence agent for the US govt. Global probably utilizes the ChoicePoint (an other) databases, so as we've already seen, if you've been reading the papers and MSM, these databases are neither secure nor 100% reliable. But for the US government's harassment purposes with ordinary citizens with no terrorist intentions whatsoever, we are all lumped into the 'suspect' camp.

The profile is : if you're a US citizen you're guilty until proven innocent. And there's no need to get a warrant, due process can't save you from Bush's jackboots. Today I read in the postings that a 4 yr old from Houston was on the NoFlyList along with the author of Bush's Brain, someone on the list apparently because he criticized our fearless leader.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
81. KICKYPOO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
82. By tomorrow the Freeps will be doing a Dan Rather on her.
What is CNN going to do? She is one of their stars? They kiss ass for W. and Rove but do they really want to lose Amanpour to NBC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chalco Donating Member (817 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
84. Wolf Blitzer did something on this story today.
Did anyone else see it? His reporter refuted it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
85. Is this a WH smokescreen to hide the CIA-Iran nuclear weapon plan story?
Edited on Thu Jan-05-06 10:03 PM by McCamy Taylor
Bush-Rove typically try to mask a pr disaster by creating a small fire so that the smoke from that one will hide the smoke from the fire they dont want reporters to notice. The fed Armstrong Williams to the press between Selection 2004 and the innauguration to get people to stop talking about exit polls and other problems before the tsunami happened and gave them breathing space. News involving journalists always catches reporters' eyes.

So, is the WH encouraging Andrea Mitchell and NBC to run with this story? Think about it.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-intel4jan04,1,4817832.story?coll=la-headlines-world
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC