Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

it is playing out as bi-partison at this time says Chris Todd on WSJ-cpan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:03 AM
Original message
it is playing out as bi-partison at this time says Chris Todd on WSJ-cpan
also that we will see if this will continue.

He is Hotline Editor in Chief.--talking of the lobby scandle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think he is right--I keep hearing both Dems and Repugs are involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Has anyone seen a poll on this?---Have the Repugs convinced most that
the Dems are involved as much as the Repugs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. If it is a bipartisan scandal,
should it not be treated as such? Who shows the most integrity? The party that can't publicly deal with this sort of problem, or the party who will?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blutodog Donating Member (291 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. Bi-Partisan my ass
The media is playing this as a Bi-partisan scandal and soon I predict they'll make Brian Dorgan a D the poster boy for this scandal. Typical MSM move these days even though we all know it's a 90% rethug scandal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. spin, spin spin...
that doesn't change it at the core. Of course, there are corrupt dems. But the scandal is primarily rethug, without question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. Only in theory -- all the names are Rethuglican
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. Dems need to aggressively speak out and NOW before this
gets more firmly entrenched. I don't understand what their strategy is. If they are still embracing the give-them-enough-rope-and-they'll-hang-themselves plan, this is not the time to do it. They need to hammer and hammer away. Loudly. Every chance they get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MessiahRp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I think they're playing wait and see..
They might be worried about some of their more powerful figures getting too deeply wrapped up in this and if they go out and talk about it they cut off their effectiveness by getting the press to target their roles in this.

Rp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. This and it's not even started to play out yet. Reject the spin
Yes, Ney is certainly congressman No. 1, but we have no other indictments or resignations.

This is classic campaigning creating impressions before the facts are revealled. A



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
9. I was really pissed until I realized you weren't talking about Chris Dodd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
10. Most People Don't Even Know Who Abramoff is
Andy Warhol must be laughing in his grave. Except for the die-hards reading the blogs, no one had ever heard of Abramoff or really has had enough time to digest what the hell is going on here...so how can anyone draw any conclusions? It's like predicting the final score in the top of the first inning.

Typical Chuck Tool spin...wishing yet another scandal away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
11. Did the guy offer any evidence, or just lie like the rest?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC