Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ann says you are a traitor. I think she may be a drunk. You be the judge

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 06:04 PM
Original message
Ann says you are a traitor. I think she may be a drunk. You be the judge
This column, just posted, is incoherent. She is a public figure, so I don't think I can be sued for this speculation. I can't post the link, because Ann doesn't allow it. Go to the (yuck) Drudge Report and find it.

Democrats AND OTHER TRAITORS (emphasis added) have tried to couch their opposition to the NSA program in civil libertarian terms, claiming Bush could have gone to the court created by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and gotten warrants for the interceptions.

The Treason Times reported FISA virtually rubber-stamps warrant requests all the time. As proof, the Times added this irrelevant statistic: In 2004, "1,754 warrants were approved." No one thought to ask how many requests were rejected.

Over and over we heard how the FISA court never turns down an application for a warrant. USA Today quoted liberal darling and author James Bamford saying: "The FISA court is as big a rubber stamp as you can possibly get within the federal judiciary." He "wondered why Bush sought the warrantless searches, since the FISA court rarely rejects search requests," said USA Today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. ann coulter channels joseph goebbels
she is a nazi pig
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasmeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. How can she not allow you to post a link? I've never heard of that.
She's a gem--and by gem I mean turd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBaldyMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. don't give the site the traffic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Not about that person
Edited on Thu Jan-05-06 06:14 PM by MrMonk
If the court's so secretive, how did we learn the number of warrants authorized? Couldn't one go to the same source to learn the number requested?

More on topic: Does it really matter whether the court is a rubber stamp for secret warrants? If they approve the warrant the tap is legal. If they don't approve, it is not. There are no exceptions based on the difficulty of getting a warrant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Do you want to hear Man Coulter ...
... squeal like a PIG? Tell her that her phones have been wire-tapped for so long now, the NSA has tapes of her since BEFORE she was even a female ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. "I think she may be a drunk."
I thought that was an open secret. I recall a local columnist (NJ) writing about an interview that she granted him, and speculating about how much wine she must swallow. This was from a guy who liked her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. David Brock confirms
In Blinded by the Right, he said she lives on Chardonnay and cigarettes. He also told a story about getting so drunk and stoned with Laura Ingram they couldn't figure out how to get her purse out of his car's trunk. He knows these people up close and personal from his days as a RW shill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Many thanks. She is about to implode. She doesn't have Rush's protection
Rush is comfortably covered in his drug addiction, until he dies. Ann doesn't have Power behind her like that. She will be dumped fast. I don't know why these horrid people think that their "allies" will risk their lives and reputations for them. They are alone. And they have chosen their course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edbermac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ann Coulter is a Neo-Nazi Bitch...
And that's about the nicest thing I can say about her...




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Wow. Way hotter than she actually is.
She is grotesque, and not cuddly at all. Those artificial boobs belong on the Concerned Women for America broads (yes, they are broads.).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peanutcat Donating Member (492 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. Ann Colter . . . .
isn't drunk; She's fugging crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. Ann drinkin' and shootin'.

Looks like a can of beer behind Sniper Ann.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. That woman is ugly, inside and out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBaldyMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. high crimes and misdemeanors: the case against clinton
but bushco can do no wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 06:30 PM
Original message
"I can't post the link, because Ann doesn't allow it."
Hahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!! :rofl:

You get "Funniest Post of the Day Award".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
13. Let me wipe the rage-induced spittle off the inside of my screen, first
This woman is Krazy-with-a-captial-K. Even the Kool-Aid drinkers have to back away from this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
16. Can you believe my brother did this?
I sent my father Jimmy Carter's new book, "Our Endangered Values", for Christmas. My brother countered with Coulter's "How To Talk to a Liberal".
I really don't like my brother anymore.
I love him. He's my brother.
I just don't like the person he's become.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
17. Ann's insane ... a sociopath and liar. She belongs in a padded cell.
Edited on Thu Jan-05-06 07:05 PM by TahitiNut
The 11-judge court that authorizes FISA wiretaps modified only two search warrant orders out of the 13,102 applications approved over the first 22 years of the court's operation.

But since 2001, the judges have modified 179 of the 5,645 requests for surveillance by the Bush administration, according to Justice Department reports. A total of 173 of those court-ordered "substantive modifications" took place in 2003 and 2004. And, the judges also rejected or deferred at least six requests for warrants during those two years -- the first outright rejection of a wiretap request in the court's history."

So, between 2001 and 2004 inclusive (four years), there were 5,645 requests for surveillance by the Bush administration, or 1,411 per year on average. In the prior 22 years, 13,102 applications were approved, which is about 596 per year on average.

Thus, the Bush Regime is getting FISA warrants at a rate that's 137% higher than the prior 22 years ... and they still avoid the FISA court and conduct illegal surveillance on top of all that.

Color me suspicious, but I'd be willing to bet that they went ahead and did the surveillance that the FISA Court rejected, too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Put this phrase in bold
Edited on Thu Jan-05-06 06:59 PM by MrMonk
"the first outright rejection of a wiretap request in the court's history."

On edit: nothing more to be said
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
19. Me? A traitor?
What that, that . . . (what the hell is it?) doesn't seem to be able to get through its manly head is that there are times when we must protect our country from our government.

I can't even call it a dog. Too insulting to the canines.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC