Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WSJ Reporter on Olberman says Abramoff is bluffing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:07 PM
Original message
WSJ Reporter on Olberman says Abramoff is bluffing
he really can't bring 60 people down.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, and the Iraqis are gonna love us when we invade them
Oh, and there was no wrong doing at Enron, it was just a market turn down.

These are other spot on prognostications from the WSJ, the raggiest business paper in the entire world
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. The Wall Street Urinal guy did say, however,
that this is definitely a Republican scandal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. yes -- to his credit
now they are running thru Delay's many shady dealings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, the Justice Dept. won't be very happy with being "bluffed".
That would mean Jack will be going to jail for much longer.

Is Jack that stupid and suicidal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. He says Abramoff is using that figure to try to get a lighter sentence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. What lighter sentence? 220 years instead of 350? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. He's gone from 60 years down to 10 so far...
With a wife and five kids, I imagine he's motivated...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. 10 years for all the damage he's caused?
I was being facetious with my response, but I wasn't aware that this rat bastard was looking at only 10 years. I guess crime does pay, very well indeed, depending on who your partners in crime are.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Yep, a lousy ten years.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Well, when it comes to plea deals
you have to play to pay.

I'm happy with his only serving 10 years, as long as he serves up the good on those rat bastards -- ESPECIALLY Delay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. Jack's sentence will be based on what he delivers, not what he
says he can deliver. That caveat is included in these types of pleas.

If he did bluff, he was really damn stupid.

I would also believe that the DOJ required more and has more then just Jack's word regarding who they are going to go after.

-----------------------------------
How ya doing, CatWoman?

For once, I'm not watching Keith because I'm watching the Moran/Murtha town hall on C-span 2. I know I'm going to be up late so I figure I can watch Keith when he repeats.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. He did say that Abram had bargained
his sentence down from 70 years to 10 and in trying for a whole monty. He also said that this was strictly a republican scandal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Jack is betting on the pardon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. he did say this is a repuke scandal
on the plus side.:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. the reporter did emphasize that this is a REPUBLICAN scandal
thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. see above
we all agree on that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. Even if it is a mere half-dozen, it will be worth it. Hey, even just
Delay, it will be worth it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. I especially hope they get DeLay, Ney, Hastert, Burns, Blunt and Frist.
That would make my day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC