StarTribune.com MINNEAPOLIS - ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA
Editorial: A tale of two health care systems
In England, care for all; in the United States, not so much.
A woman visiting England recently had a fingernail pulled out by its roots in a car door. She was taken to a local clinic in Cornwall, then referred to a regional hospital in the National Health Service system. The hospital was crowded and a little run-down. The woman had to wait a fair amount of time. But finally she was seen by a doctor who cleaned the wound and explained the nail had to be replaced and held securely or it might not regrow. That was done and she was provided pain medications, then discharged. Cost to her: not one pence.
Now fast-forward to New Year's Eve last week in Florida. A young mother of two, Ruby Cintron, was watching fireworks when she was hit in the eye by a .45-caliber bullet fired into the air by some knucklehead who thought that was a cool way to celebrate. The bullet destroyed Cintron's right eye and lodged in the rear of the eye socket. She was taken to a hospital and treated. But her destroyed eye was not removed, nor was the bullet. She was discharged because she had no health insurance and, as a (legal) noncitizen from Ecuador, was not entitled to free care.
Can anyone NOT see what's wrong here? Too bad for Cintron it didn't happen in England or most other industrial societies -- where she would have been received as a human being in need and provided proper care without regard for where she was from, her citizenship status or what health insurance cards she carried in her wallet.
In whose lifetime will the wasteful United States finally join the civilized world, where universal care is recognized as both less expensive and morally required? England's NHS has many flaws; the United States shouldn't follow that model. But universal care with an American flavor must come. Stories like Ruby Cintron's tell why.
http://www.startribune.com/561/story/165827.html