Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Libby: Fitz Narrowing Powers In Effort to Avoid Dismissal! (WaPo)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 10:01 PM
Original message
Libby: Fitz Narrowing Powers In Effort to Avoid Dismissal! (WaPo)
Edited on Fri Mar-31-06 10:05 PM by kpete
Libby: Fitz Narrowing Powers In Effort to Avoid Dismissal!(WaPo)

Libby Says Prosecutor Trying to Keep Post
Fitzgerald's appointment violates federal law
By PETE YOST
The Associated Press
Friday, March 31, 2006; 7:47 PM

WASHINGTON -- Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald is narrowing the description of his powers in an effort to counter calls for dismissal of the criminal case he brought against Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff, defense lawyers said Friday.

In a 24-page filing in federal court, the legal team for I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby said Fitzgerald and the former Justice Department official who appointed him, James Comey, are changing the broad mandate the prosecutor was handed to probe the leak in the Valerie Plame affair.

Libby is under indictment on five counts of perjury, obstruction and lying to the FBI about how he learned of Plame's CIA identity and what he told reporters about her. Plame's CIA status was exposed on July 14, 2003, by conservative columnist Robert Novak, eight days after Plame's husband accused the Bush administration of twisting prewar intelligence to exaggerate the Iraqi threat from weapons of mass destruction.

The defense attorneys say assignment of unsupervised and undirected power to Fitzgerald requires that he be relieved of his duties in the investigation and that all actions he has taken be voided.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/31/AR2006033101624.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Libby says!?!?!
Libby don't know jack!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. LOL!
:o
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. They come up with this shit now? 2 years later?
:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh, let them try
They'll unleash a shitstorm like they've never seen before.

To many, Fitz is like a last hope for America.

And I tend to agree.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. That's nothing but a press release from Libby
Shame on Yost and the WP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. Reads like mumbo-jumbo...
Since when do defense attorneys get to fire prosecutors?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. What a jerk this lawyer is.
The last two paragraphs read like this.

Fitzgerald and Comey said that Fitz was the functional equivalent of the attorney general for the limited scope defined for him when Fitz was appointed as special counsel. Special, not independent. Comey said that functional equivalent doesn't mean Fitz is relieved of following justice department guidelines.

Libby lawyer says no no no, first Fitz said he is the functional equivalent of the attorney general, THEN he says that it's limited in scope. Fitz is obviously lying then or lying now.

The lawyer makes two complimentary facts seem like contradictory facts for the simple reason that he says they are so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. That article, and the filing, is full of crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC