Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Put Zinni on the ticket as VP. The repukes would piss in their pants.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 10:20 PM
Original message
Put Zinni on the ticket as VP. The repukes would piss in their pants.
He was brilliant on MTP today. Timmy knew this guy had his shit together, so he didn't rough him up like he did MaPain on a few occasions.

Every thing Zinni predicted back in 2002/2003 has come true. Can you imagine some idiot like Jeb Bush or George Allen trying to debate this man?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Did we see the same show?
Zinni let * off the hook completely - said he'd been given "bad intelligence".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I think the gloves would come off if he were running
against those bastards. Bush WAS given bad intelligence. It's not his fault daddy's sperm and mommy's egg produced an idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Have you heard 'bout Waas' latest report?
Edited on Sun Apr-02-06 10:57 PM by Fredda Weinberg
* knew about those aluminum tubes, but stuck to the lie that they were useful for centrifuges. No, I think Zinni is covering for the clan and wouldn't want to see him nominated for dog catcher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Zinni all but said they were lying.
I don't think the corporate media would even give him an interview if he were going around calling Bush a lying sack of shit.

Retired Generals are always somewhat guarded with their remarks about the President. Zinni is no different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. You don't know the corporate media as well as you think you do
They love controversy - if Zinni called out *, he'd get headline play. He'd just have to have his facts in order.

If he doesn't know, he should say so - rather, he cleared * which will only make the Iranian threat more credible. No, he did another disservice to this nation but probably helped himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Zinni was against the war from the beginning
How did he do another disservice to this nation? He was one of the few voices out there before the invasion saying this was a mistake. Our dems were falling all over themselves supporting the damn invasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. "Who's mistake?" is the relevant question
It's everyone's fault but *'s
Now, in a new book about his career, co-written with Tom Clancy, called "Battle Ready," Zinni has handed up a scathing indictment of the Pentagon and its conduct of the war in Iraq.

In the book, Zinni writes: "In the lead up to the Iraq war and its later conduct, I saw at a minimum, true dereliction, negligence and irresponsibility, at worse, lying, incompetence and corruption."

“I think there was dereliction in insufficient forces being put on the ground and fully understanding the military dimensions of the plan. I think there was dereliction in lack of planning,” says Zinni. “The president is owed the finest strategic thinking. He is owed the finest operational planning. He is owed the finest tactical execution on the ground. … He got the latter. He didn’t get the first two.”

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/05/21/60minutes/main618896.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Zinni also said
"I only went to the Wall once, and it was very difficult," he says, talking about his sole visit to the Vietnam Veterans Memorial on the Mall. "I was walking down past the names of my men," he recalls. "My buddies, my troops -- just walking down that Wall was hard, and I couldn't go back."

Now he feels his nation -- and a new generation of his soldiers -- have been led down a similar path.

"Obviously there are differences" between Vietnam and Iraq, he says. "Every situation is unique." But in his bones, he feels the same chill. "It feels the same. I hear the same things -- about not telling the good news, about cooking up a rationale for getting into the war." He sees both conflicts as beginning with deception by the U.S. government, drawing a parallel between how the Johnson administration handled the beginning of the Vietnam War and how the Bush administration touted the threat presented by Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. "I think the American people were conned into this," he says. Referring to the 1964 Gulf of Tonkin incident, in which the Johnson administration claimed that U.S. Navy ships had been subjected to an unprovoked attack by North Vietnam, he says, "The Gulf of Tonkin and the case for WMD and terrorism is synonymous in my mind."

--------------------------------------------------------

Most retired Generals talk like Zinni when referring to the President - any President.

Why is it that certain people on this board continue to blast anyone that's not a member of their approved board of liberal thinkers? When Zinni or Lou Dobbs or anyone else not on their politically correct list says something that helps our cause, they are immediately attacked. My own mother voted for Bush in 2000. If she posted on this board, she would be crucified if those facts were revealed. No wonder we keep losing elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. It doesn't help our cause to lie
or cover-up deliberate deception.

I don't know if you remember Watergate, but I do. Democrats made major gains once it was conclusively demonstrated that Nixon himself participated in the crimes for which Mitchell, Haldeman and Ehrlichman were willing to take the rap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Only problem I had with him is that he wants to stay in Iraq
Otherwise, he really is a dynamo speaking truth to power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LA lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. hmmmm
According to Tom Clancy he is a registered Repub and he endorsed Bush Cheney in 2000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. My 87-year-old mother voted for Bush Cheney in 2000
Now she is back as a registered Democrat and hates those two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. That's true. He just stated that this morning on WJ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC