Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry seeks liberal-cred - calls for withdrawl by the end of the year...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 10:49 PM
Original message
Kerry seeks liberal-cred - calls for withdrawl by the end of the year...
It's obviously a move to gear up for a Presidential run, no?

It's still the right thing, of course...

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/4/4/225747/5243

"If Iraq's leaders succeed in putting together a government, then we must agree on another deadline: a schedule for withdrawing American combat forces by year's end. Doing so will empower the new Iraqi leadership, put Iraqis in the position of running their own country and undermine support for the insurgency, which is fueled in large measure by the majority of Iraqis who want us to leave their country. Only troops essential to finishing the job of training Iraqi forces should remain."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WildEyedLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Feingold seeks liberal cred - calls for censure of Bush"
How does that sound? Because it's essentially the same thing.

I believe BOTH men are acting out of the true conviction of their hearts, and EVERY Democrat should praise them both for their bravery and vision, instead of tearing them down for offering a real alternative to Bush's war and death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. AMEN!
Edited on Tue Apr-04-06 11:00 PM by onehandle
This is why I posted the link DIRECTLY to the Op-Ed in the "Editorials & Other Articles" forum.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x201578

The Op-Ed:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/05/opinion/05kerry.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
globalvillage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Agree, WEL
Sometimes people just do the right thing because it's the right thing to do.
This is one of those times.

Hope everyone's calling their elected officials and telling them to BACK THIS PLAN!!!!


May 15. It's a date.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaukraut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Indeed, WEL
Feingold and Kerry's motives should be above suspicion for all of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Two Deadlines and an Exit! Bring our troops home! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fedupinBushcountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 10:57 PM
Original message
Give me a break
The man has been on top of this all along. Sorry he has rained on your parade.

This has nothing to do with politics it has to do with getting our troops home NOW, and ending Bush's blunder.

Walk a day in his shoes, and talk your trash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. It could be a run-up to an 08 campaign, but you're right to say
it's a good thing anyways.

Senator Kerry knows his constituency, and so his words here are not going to alienate many Massachusetts Democrats.

And he already knows he does not have the hearts of deep-fried Republican Bush voters in Alabama.

So I think part of his saying this so well (as usual) and so strongly (as is called for) is that it puts still more pressure on the Bush administration to defend its undefendable lying about the war, and it makes it harder for the GOP to blather on about "discernible progress" in Iraq. Because if there's been progress, where the hell IS it?

If the Bush team has a substantive counter to Kerry's argument, they need to bring their sorry butts outside and present it. Otherwise, Kerry's version is the working version, and with polls tilting more and more blue for 06, Emporer Bush is buck naked and the wind from the latest approval polls is blowing real cold.

Good for Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. He's led on the war since before the war
He pushed Bush to the UN and Congress in 2002. He warned about rebuilding the country "That effort is going to be long term, costly, and not without difficulty, given Iraq's ethnic and religious divisions and history of domestic turbulence." He's the one that said not to rush to war in Jan 2003, and laid out the correct path to take. He pressed for a better reconstruction effort in July 2003, "Peacekeeping is linked to the humanitarian and to the governance transformation and the global investment in that is the fastest, most effective way to be able to strengthen our goals and provide safety to our troops.” He warned about civil war in his speech in Missouri in 2004. He called for benchmarks and a plan to turn over the country, sector by sector, last October.

At every step of the way he warned that if Bush did not proceed correctly, Iraq would not have a successful and peaceful outcome. This has nothing to do with any liberal cred. It's the same as when he's fighting for armor or benefits or PTSD care. He has offered yet another plan for Iraq to come together, one last chance, and no matter what happens, for our troops to come home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Island Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. Sen. Kerry has spoken consistantly on this issue.
The only difference now is that he's added a specific date. (Back in October he said the next six months would be the test for Iraq - they've obviously failed and now it's time for us to leave.)

And really, does it matter who made this statement or why? A Democratic leader is saying aloud what all of us have been saying for months (make that years). That's good enough for me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. Kerry has had liberal cred for years now...
It's not that he's new on the block...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
10. Shouldn't you be calling Dems to get on board with this? n/t
Edited on Tue Apr-04-06 11:10 PM by politicasista
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. I had the impression that most here were ALREADY on board....
... and that Kerry, etc. were the slow ones to get on board...


Maybe I'm the only one recalling all the praise of Murtha, and criticism over Kerry, etc. not being behind him...

(shrug) Fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrpCaptMandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'm all for it
For the more than 2300 shattered American families (not to mention the Iraqi families), I just wish he'd had the personal strength to do this back in 2004. What was that line about being the last person to die for a mistake?

Better sooner, than later, though, for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. Senator Kerry has consistently been outspoken on Iraq not
because it has to do with an election, but simply because it concerns our security and the security of the Middle East.
The senator often does things because they are the right things to do and because he does have integrity.

I support his position and I hope that something good comes from this Op-Ed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
13. No.
He has liberal cred.

Why label it thus, when no one seem to think such things of Feingold, who is also likely running for prez.

Why not just call it a good thing to do?

When the man says it's time to bring the troops home, he means it. He's not playing 2008 games.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Amen! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC