Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

2 MPs passed AlJazeera doc to Dem in Oct '04 hoping to influence election

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-08-06 10:40 PM
Original message
2 MPs passed AlJazeera doc to Dem in Oct '04 hoping to influence election
Edited on Sun Jan-08-06 11:00 PM by kpete
MPs leaked Bush plan to hit al-Jazeera


David Leigh and Richard Norton-Taylor
Monday January 9, 2006
The Guardian


Two Labour MPs have defied the Official Secrets Act by passing on the contents of a secret British document revealing how President George Bush wanted to bomb the Arabic TV station, al-Jazeera.

The document, a transcript of a meeting between Mr Bush and Tony Blair in April 2004 when the prime minister expressed concern about US military tactics in Iraq, is already the subject of an unprecedented official secrets prosecution in Britain, against an aide to one of the MPs and another man.

The information was then acquired by Mr Clarke, who in turn consulted his parliamentary colleague, Peter Kilfoyle. The two politicians decided to pass on the information to a contact in the US.The two MPs decided in October 2004 to reveal the contents of the transcript of the Blair-Bush meeting to John Latham, a Democrat supporter living in San Diego, California. They hoped to influence the impending 2004 US election, Mr Kilfoyle said.



http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/story/0,12956,1682258,00.html?gusrc=rss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-08-06 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. So, this John Latham sat on this for a year... did not pass it on
to newspapers before the election. and he is a DEMOCRAT?

Oh, I see. he is from DNC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-08-06 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Latham, a "retired electrical engineer"
Why him? What qualified him to be entrusted with such explosive documents?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-09-06 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Interesting
I wonder why him too. :shrug: It doesn't make any sense to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-08-06 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Very strange story... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-08-06 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I Agree
REALLY STRANGE...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-08-06 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. from Kos
As revealed in tomorrow's Guardian the two MPs sent the transcript to


John Latham, a Democrat supporter living in San Diego, California. They hoped to influence the impending 2004 US election ...

In San Diego, Mr Latham, 71, a retired electrical engineer and a "contributing member" to the Democrat National Committee, told the Guardian that the MPs also wanted him to send letters with the information to newspapers in Los Angeles and New York. At a meeting at the House of Commons, he had been introduced to Mr Clarke by Mr Kilfoyle. Mr Latham, a British expatriate, and Mr Kilfoyle had attended the same school.

Mr Latham said he had never met Mr Clarke before. He added: "He mentioned that the document was a transcript of a meeting in Washington DC between Bush and Blair. There had been a proposal to take military action against al-Jazeera at their headquarters in Qatar. This was defused by Colin Powell, US secretary of state, and Tony Blair."

Mr Latham decided not to write to US newspapers at the time, in October 2004. As a result, details of the Washington meeting between Mr Bush and Mr Blair remained secret for more than a year.

http://dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/1/8/233925/6579
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-08-06 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. And I wonder...

Did Mr Latham decide not to contact K/E at the time, too, in October 2004?

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmakaze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-09-06 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Hmmm
I wonder if certain communications may have been monitored, and a certain Democrat may have received a friendly visit informing him that exposing secret documents of an allied nation was rather hazardous to the health?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-09-06 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. San Diego and Gitmo have similar climates...

but I see what you're saying.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-09-06 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. also does he live in a certain congressional district
which is now sans-Congressman?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-09-06 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Or he contacted Terry Mac and Bill Clinton who advised - Don't go there.
DNC was still very much under the command of Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-09-06 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. I wonder if the bush/ANG document fiasco influenced his decision
IIRC, that was in circulation in September or thereabouts. Maybe he didn't feel confident the information wouldn't backfire, at that point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toymachines Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-09-06 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. They should have passed it to this san diegan
I sure as hell woudln't have sat on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-09-06 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
14. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
15. Weird story.
No John Latham or J. Latham from CA is shown as contributing to the DNC in any of the last 3 election cycles:

http://www.opensecrets.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Nice catch. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC