Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Alarm over shopping radio tags (BBC) {RFID}

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 07:10 PM
Original message
Alarm over shopping radio tags (BBC) {RFID}
By David Reid
Click reporter
***
{Vint Cert} told Click: "What everybody worries about is that these identifiers will be used not to keep track of the object, but of the person associated with the object and then there's a Big Brother scenario that everybody worries about.

"But when the economics get to the point where the readers are inexpensive and the chips are inexpensive, then you start to ask yourself who has the ability to read the chips and what do they do with the information?"

But with remotely readable tags on everything from boots to beans, is it the customers or what they buy that is being labelled?

Former Australian privacy commissioner Malcolm Crompton says: "If done wrongly, it really is possible that I can buy things in one shop and be tracked in another shop, that the data, once collected, stays there for someone to come in and collect and use under circumstances that I don't know about or that I don't approve of.
***
more: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/click_online/4886598.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
matt819 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Point taken
But wouldn't the RFID tag be removed when the item is purchased, as the magnetic anti-theft tags are removed or deactivated? I'm all for tracking product and inventory - it's good business sense. But there certainly is a mechanism for removing that once the item has left inventory, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. some tags could be left with the article to track but NOT to
set of thief alarms. So two tags one that sets off alarm if not cleared and one that is a silent tracker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Pay with cash, and who knows you bought it?
or just use a boxcutter to carefully lift up a few "coils" and sever them :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeaBob Donating Member (447 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. RFID
The whole rfid thing has gotten completely out of hand. And it has been fueled by people who know nothing about the technology.
1st RFID "Tags" are more expensive than Bar codes. So why use RFID and where?
RFID is primarily used in the field of logistics and supply chain management. The main reason for using RFID is because it is easier to walk down an aisle of Containers in a shipyard or a ware house and have the signals received in a scanner. This beats having to scan each item in terms of time & money. Also RFID tags on container locks provide more security than anything else that has come down the pike.

It is used to keep track of Items at different levels of packaging. By different levels I am referring to Containers, then crates in a ware house and finally individual packages.

Now pay attention folks each level of packaging has different needs in terms of how far the "tag' must broadcast Tags on containers usually broadcast for a distance up to 20 - 25 feet. tags in side crates usually broadcast for a distance of 15 - 20 feet
and lastly the tags inside individual packages broadcast for a distance of 5 - 10 feet. and each type of tags requires a different frequency. so a hand held scanner designed for receiving a signal from a distance of 20 - 25 feet wont work on other frequency.

Lastly Tags come in two general types Active and passive. what I have described here are active tags. They scream out all the time with the information that has been programed into them. Active tags are way more expensive than passive tags. in some cases, such as a container lock, they may cost as much as $2500.00
Passive tags are real dummies. they need a scanner to poke them before they provide any information. they are much cheaper they can range from a nickel to 50.00 depending on where they are going to be used.

In any event the likely hood of anyone being able to drive down any street and read what someone has in there home is stuff of someones over active imagination


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. They wont need to
drive down the street and read what is in someones home

They're going to have the garbage removal service do it for them.

They already have experimental programs going on like that in Europe, as it will eventually be an integral component of keeping track of consumption guidelines, for VAT, flat income tax and other personal data on your permanent record.

They are also developing RFID for id documents and inspection stickers that will be read on the fly for ID and toll purposes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom_Aflaim Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. TIP - RFID tags can be deactivated
20 seconds in the microwave is all its takes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Have you tried a Taser? That was my first thought. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom_Aflaim Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. No I havent, but I bet it works
Although you would have to be careful not to zap yourself. There a very funny story floating around of a guy who did just that to see what it was like. Suffice to say that he thought they were quite effective :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC