|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:03 PM Original message |
How did we end up with Lieberman on the ticket with Gore in 2000? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:04 PM Response to Original message |
1. Because he is a social conservative who criticized Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:06 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Beats the hell and all out of me? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:05 PM Response to Original message |
2. I think Al Gore is wondering the same thing.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:15 PM Response to Reply #2 |
15. lol! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
3. It's thanks to Clinton and his womanizing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:19 PM Response to Reply #3 |
23. sexuality is not the only moral compass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-10-06 08:45 PM Response to Reply #23 |
40. I definitely agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crazy Guggenheim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
5. ....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wilms (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:07 PM Response to Original message |
6. That was done so Nader would not be the reason we lost. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scot (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:07 PM Response to Original message |
7. Ask Al. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanMichael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:08 PM Response to Original message |
8. We needed to shore up the chinless vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:09 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Too bad no one checked the butterfly ballots ahead of time instead. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanMichael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:11 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. True. Or better yet kept Nader off the ballot along with several other... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:13 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. I think your first posting was correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanMichael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:17 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. Very true. It was a slam on a 90% Dem voting group. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
11. Gore sought in part to position himself as a candidate who might |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:15 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. IMO, this is a classic case of selection by poll rather than by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
13. It was the "Consultantocracy" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:18 PM Response to Reply #13 |
22. Horse With No Name, you're a genius! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:21 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. Hey then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
16. Gore and Lieberman were once very close ideologically |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
17. that was before his religious war. i do believe the reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-10-06 05:44 AM Response to Reply #17 |
39. Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:17 PM Response to Original message |
18. Lieberman was a masterful choice at the time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanMichael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:25 PM Response to Reply #18 |
27. He didn't win those states the ticket did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-10-06 05:13 AM Response to Reply #27 |
36. The Jews voted in massive numbers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:42 PM Response to Reply #18 |
34. .....and I believe it was to separate himself from Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killerbush (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:18 PM Response to Original message |
20. That's the best thing Gore did in 2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crazy Guggenheim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:18 PM Response to Original message |
21. The play it safe stratergy. "Mr. Safe Choice" Lieberman stabbed Gore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYCGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:39 PM Response to Reply #21 |
33. Actually, when Lieberman was chosen, it was considered a very bold move. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rocket Surgeon (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
24. I think it was the combination with Tipper... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
26. Gore chose him! I hate to beat a dead horse, but why do y'all want Gore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:31 PM Response to Reply #26 |
31. I don't think back then anyone had any idea how badly Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
28. I like Al Gore, but I think he fucked up his campaign in many ways, not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:27 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:31 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Despite what the GOP did, it's a disgrace that Gore came in the way he did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ldf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 10:07 PM Response to Reply #29 |
35. we don't need anyone to "PLAY" politics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alphafemale (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-09-06 09:32 PM Response to Original message |
32. Gore needed a running mate who wouldn't eclipse his personality? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ScreamingMeemie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-10-06 05:24 AM Response to Original message |
37. I think you would need to look at Lieberman "then", not Lieberman "now" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killbotfactory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-10-06 05:33 AM Response to Original message |
38. It was a strategic move to alienate young voters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:14 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC