Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How did we end up with Lieberman on the ticket with Gore in 2000?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:03 PM
Original message
How did we end up with Lieberman on the ticket with Gore in 2000?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because he is a social conservative who criticized Clinton
One of the amazingly stupid moves by the Democrats in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Beats the hell and all out of me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think Al Gore is wondering the same thing....
:beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. lol!


:toast: :beer: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's thanks to Clinton and his womanizing
that Gore had to find a running mate who had good morals. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
23. sexuality is not the only moral compass
i think lieberman is bereft of many morals...just cos he doesnt fuck around doesnt make him moral
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #23
40. I definitely agree
there's lots of things that are more immoral than fucking around. I guess that choice was to appeal to those who think you're only immoral if you screw around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. .......
:popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. That was done so Nader would not be the reason we lost. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scot Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ask Al.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. We needed to shore up the chinless vote.
Edited on Sun Apr-09-06 09:09 PM by JanMichael
Seriously.

Edited to avoid being called an anti-semite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Too bad no one checked the butterfly ballots ahead of time instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. True. Or better yet kept Nader off the ballot along with several other...
...Leftist candidates.

Even better we coulda prevented the bleeping felon voter purge that was entirely bogus and prevented thousands of people from voting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. I think your first posting was correct.
I think people who thought they could pander to Jewish voters by nominating Lieberman were at fault. It was an insult to a group of voters who have been a solid foundation of the Democratic Party for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Very true. It was a slam on a 90% Dem voting group.
Like they'd vote en masse for Bush or sadly Buchanan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. Gore sought in part to position himself as a candidate who might
Edited on Sun Apr-09-06 09:13 PM by Old Crusoe
appeal more to the "morally conscious" voter, which could be anything from those who felt Bill Clinton betrayed his marriage vows all the way to people who think rock or rap music are decadent. Lieberman had railed for a long time about "decadent" Hollywood and the moral decay of young people, etc., and Gore's wife Tipper launched a Congressional panel to examine the evils of rock lyrics. Frank Zappa testified before that committee, among others. The strongest anti-censorship talk was by John Denver, of all people.

Gore was advised that he needed a little eastern establishment Democratic credentials and a high-profile Democratic Senator from Connecticut would help. Hence, Lieberman and Kerry were on the final short list for veep choices.

Not least, Florida mattered even in the early going, and Lieberman, who is Jewish, had strong appeal to the Palm Beach/Broward Jewish vote -- very arguably enough to win in Florida (were it not for the stealing of that state's election by Katherine Harris and others).

At the time, and for some pretty good reasons, Lieberman wasn't a bad choice.

I was rooting for Kerry that year, but nobody called me for my input!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. IMO, this is a classic case of selection by poll rather than by
conviction. If Gore had gone for conviction, he would have done better all around and Florida wouldn't have mattered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. It was the "Consultantocracy"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. Horse With No Name, you're a genius!
You must be, you agree with me on every aspect of this issue!(LOL)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Hey then
I guess you are a genius too! I love this article on it and I love the name it was given. That is sheer genius.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
16. Gore and Lieberman were once very close ideologically
They were the only two Democratic Senators to vote for the first Gulf War.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
17. that was before his religious war. i do believe the reason
lieberman is behaving like this is because he is jewish and this war fits with his religious beliefs. they have just taken forefront instead of reason on this. otherwise lieberman had in the past been a good dem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 05:44 AM
Response to Reply #17
39. Huh?
What do you mean by your statement that "lieberman is behaving like this is because he is jewish and this war fits with his religious beliefs. they have just taken forefront instead of reason on this"? I assume you're referring to the war in Iraq. What religious ideas would motivate him to support the war?

The truth is that Lieberman has always been a hawk, in the tradition of many dem hawks who came before him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
18. Lieberman was a masterful choice at the time
He was historic since he was the first Jew. He was immensely popular with the press who hated Gore. He figured to be a huge help in Florida, PA, IL, MI, OH, and NJ all of which have huge Jewish populations. He won every state in that list save Ohio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. He didn't win those states the ticket did.
And if you think the Jewish vote was going to Bush anywhere on a scale that would lose the nation you're smokin' good shit.

Now you also forgot that they won Florida too however the bigg killers there were the felon voter purge, the Greens and butterfuck ballots that confused the shit outta the old folks in Century City.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 05:13 AM
Response to Reply #27
36. The Jews voted in massive numbers
numbers much higher than they otherwise would have. There is another option in every election called staying home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #18
34. .....and I believe it was to separate himself from Clinton.
I also think Tipper had a big say in this move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killerbush Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
20. That's the best thing Gore did in 2000
Was to bring Lieberman on board. Gore blew the election himself, not Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
21. The play it safe stratergy. "Mr. Safe Choice" Lieberman stabbed Gore
in the back when he said that 'he should quit the race for the good of the country'; not an exact quote. See what the safe candidates do?

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #21
33. Actually, when Lieberman was chosen, it was considered a very bold move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rocket Surgeon Donating Member (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
24. I think it was the combination with Tipper...
If anyone remembers, Tipper's PMRC group waged a "war of decency" against The Dead Kennedy's cover art for Frankenchrist.

Lieberman didn't help as he was on the board of the Parents Television Council.

A lot of progressives were turned off by Tipper and Joe's affiliations. It was a deadly combination of anti-free speech that would give the folk over at Focus on the Family a hard-on.

PROGRESSIVES DO NOT APPRECIATE HAVING HIGH PRESSURE GROUPS SHOVE THEIR VALUES DOWN THE THROATS OF OTHERS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
26. Gore chose him! I hate to beat a dead horse, but why do y'all want Gore
back?! He screwed up the VP choice, and he screwed up the part where Dems were supposed to stand up and demand justice for having our votes stolen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. I don't think back then anyone had any idea how badly Bush
could screw up this country. Gore had too many people telling him to concede for the good of the nation and he believed them. I didn't really understand how crazy Bush really is until the Memorial Service September 16, 2001 when Bush gave his speech and the final hymn was the Battle Hymn of the Republic. When I realized he was treating this event as an act of war instead of as a crime, that's when it really hit me how much trouble we were in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
28. I like Al Gore, but I think he fucked up his campaign in many ways, not
least of which was selecting Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. exactly
i liked gore too, would have made a solid president...but he cant play politics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Despite what the GOP did, it's a disgrace that Gore came in the way he did
given where he started.

:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ldf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #29
35. we don't need anyone to "PLAY" politics.
i think the hole that we are in is deep enough, thanks to those "playing" politics.

and kudos to clinton, who set such a playing field that "moral", "truth" and "integrity" were allowed to be waved as the standards of the republicans, so much so that gore had to actually run FROM clinton, rather than take pride in what they did together.

does no one REMEMBER the media hysteria that was going on at the time? my, everyone has such short memories, yet can now say with certainty that gore made every mistake he possibly could.

gore did not act in a vacuum. unfortunately, he listened to his advisors, BIG mistake. but he knows that now.

he has learned a LOT since getting his nose rubbed in it, the least of which is that the democratic leaders haven't a spine amongst them, and the DLC is the death of the democratic party.

give the man SOME credit for learning.

and other than asking his supporters to literally take to the streets, which would have meant bloodshed, there wasn't much else he could do. he was already dealing with the gangs of freepers outside his house screaming that they (the gores) should GET OUT OF CHENEY'S HOUSE. it would have only gotten a lot worse. he was concerned about this nation AND his own family.

as far as the vote count, there sure wasn't a higher court to take it to, since apparently GAWD was too busy grooming W to try to help gore out. :sarcasm:

as far as lieberman, that backstabber, he will NEVER get my support again, for anything. he was one of the first to tell gore to concede. and he has reaped the reward for it, hasn't he, since he is now the darling of the republican party.

the gore bashers here refuse to remember the full picture of what was going on, and just continue to reduce it to "he should have done this" or "he should have done that", remembering absolutely NOTHING about what gore was dealing with. and its not because it hasn't been repeated here, ad nauseum. some just have a bone to pick, and won't stop until that bone is nonexistent. (usually so they can push their own candidate.)

gore may be the only one intelligent enough, with such an incredible grasp of the BIG picture, that he may really be able to address this mess.

he is my first, second and third choices. he IS the president, and should take his rightful place, and kick that pathetic excuse of a human OUT of his house.

rant/off
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alphafemale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
32. Gore needed a running mate who wouldn't eclipse his personality? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 05:24 AM
Response to Original message
37. I think you would need to look at Lieberman "then", not Lieberman "now"
to obtain the answer. The 2000 election was well before Lieberman began his "crusade" to attempt to please the masses.

During the cloture vote, I thought-for a mere second- he was returning to his roots. How wrong I was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
38. It was a strategic move to alienate young voters
who grew up and lived with video games and movies Lieberman objected to.

As if having Tipper(PMRC) as a wife wasn't enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC