Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Ceasar Chavez nowadays would be a republican"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 11:40 AM
Original message
"Ceasar Chavez nowadays would be a republican"

a RNC man named Benitez said the above on Wash. J. this a.m. when talking about the immigration problem.

I had to laugh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. That right wing koolaid is a mind-altering drug....
:beer: :crazy: :yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. I heard that too.
I laughed out loud. These are the same people who think that Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt would still be republicans, yet JFK would have switched parties. Of course, in 25 years or so, they'll be calling Bush a liberal, just like they're doing with Nixon now. Republicans live in their own little fantasy land.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. Turn this attemped meme on it's head:
BREAKING: Republicans now embrace Ceasar Chavez!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I remember when they called his Communist, criminal and
. . . everything but child molester.

Next thing you know, they'll be claiming FDR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. That's why it's funny...
... and I'm sure if you looked hard enough, you could find republicans calling him a child molester...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. They ARE claiming FDR.
I saw an interview will William Kristol, neocon and PNACer, where he claimed that one difference between the traditional conservatives like William F. Buckley and the PNACers is that the latter embrace FDR on several issues, most importantly that FDR wanted the U.S. to enter the war long before Pearl Harbor.

Up is Down, Down is Up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. They claim JFK sometimes, too
They use his catholicism as justification, in that he would be opposed to legalized abortion. Even if that were true, he still was mostly a moderate/liberal on other issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crankie Avalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe he meant to say "Francisco Franco"...
...you know how these RNC types are with trying to keep Latin names straight (I bet his own Benitez name gives him trouble).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rocknrule Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. Adolf Hitler would be a Republican
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllieB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Stalin would be one also
although they would claim otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rocknrule Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. As would Voldemort, Palpatine, Sauron, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. They tried to pull this with MLK Jr on his birthday
that he would be considered a conservative.

Yeah, that's right MLK would be out there all gung-ho for the war

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. It only follows from logic, really
What the Republicans have been doing for the last 30 years is define a liberal as someone who lives in a fantasy Ivory Tower, and has to be homosexual, and has to be elitist, and has to be out of touch with anyone other than other elitist homosexuals. So when real liberals from our history are discussed, and it becomes apparent that their definition is miles off, they have to claim that whover they are talking about was really a conservative, in order to save the definition they've built. Their definition of a liberal is so unrealistic that probably only 5 people or less actually fit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
14. Well, considering the debunking of him, it might be true
That he hooked into a psychotherapy cult, launched purges that eliminated everybody who had started with him, and set up family members into different chunks of the union that is no longer a union (has not had a single labor contract in decades), that is just a big fundraising machine------it just might be true that an oligarchical strongman might be a Repuke today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC