Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Read The Leaker in Chief's "Answer" to the Joe Wilson Question!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 01:34 PM
Original message
Read The Leaker in Chief's "Answer" to the Joe Wilson Question!
Edited on Mon Apr-10-06 02:12 PM by leftchick
unbelievable .....

<snip>

Q Sorry. (Laughter.) My question, sir, is, well, as Anthony alluded to earlier, and as you're aware, we have many students at SAIS who are currently working for or considering working for the State Department, the various intelligence agencies and such. And how do you respond to the recent report by Prosecutor Fitzgerald that there is, in his words, a concerted -- "evidence of a concerted effort by the White House to punish Joseph Wilson" who, himself, has a distinguished record of government service?

THE PRESIDENT: Yes. No, I -- this is -- there's an ongoing legal proceeding which precludes me from talking a lot about the case. There's also an ongoing investigation that's a serious investigation. I will say this, that after we liberated Iraq, there was questions in people's minds about the basis on which I made statements, in other words, going into Iraq. And so I decided to declassify the NIE for a reason. I wanted to see -- people to see what some of those statements were based on. So I wanted to see -- I wanted people to see the truth and thought it made sense for people to see the truth. And that's why I declassified the document.

You can't talk about -- you're not supposed to talk about classified information, and so I declassified the document. I thought it was important for people to get a better sense for why I was saying what I was saying in my speeches. And I felt I could do so without jeopardizing ongoing intelligence matters, and so I did.

And as far as the rest of the case goes, you're just going to have to let Mr. Fitzgerald complete his case. And I hope you understand that. It's a serious legal matter that we've got to be careful in making public statements about it.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/04/20060410-1.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Yes. No, I -- this is -- there's an ongoing legal proceeding ...." yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Reading that made my head spin...
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
feminazi Donating Member (911 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. so is he saying he only released the NIE info AFTER
we "liberated" iraq? wasn't the leak of plaame's name before that? sometimes i think i'm living in bizarro world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. No, Plame's name was leaked in June and/or July 2003; after
the invasion...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
feminazi Donating Member (911 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #15
30. thanks, after i wrote that i slapped myself.
it's monday. i have a headache. i'm not thinking too clearly at the moment.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. What is the shit about when he says "I wanted to see"
"I wanted to see -- people to see what some of those statements were based on.
So I wanted to see -- I wanted people to see the truth and thought it made sense for people to see the truth.
And that's why I declassified the document. "

He didn't know what he saw??????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
26. He didn't know what he saw but knew what he wanted people to see.
:grr: :puke: :grr:

I am losing it. :eyes: I really am. :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. AFTER the DICK and neocons told him what people HAD to see,...
,...to save his political arse!!!

Okay. I regained enough of my sanity to post that.

I think I'll still be okay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. "and so I did."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. Was that intended to allow the questioner to pick the answer he wanted?
The fundies could say he said no. The rest of the world is left say "what the???"
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. Interesting twice-said "I wanted to see...."
Not quite sure what it means, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. This part too is strange. It's like he's repeating what
Cheney etal told him so he wouldn't go blabbing to reporters.

"You can't talk about -- you're not supposed to talk about classified information
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. it makes no sense
hell, the whole freakin transcript makes no sense. He is a fucking moron. :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Most of what * says makes no sense n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. and what precluded him from saying he leaked it...
three years ago? Their excuses and logic are so lame, they can't possibly give a shit what we the people think. He might as well still be reading "My Pet Goat"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. so begins his test driving his lies on the topic
the more he tells it, the stronger he'll believe it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jrw14125 Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. uncanny ability to simultaneously butcher truth and the english language
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
12. consistant. cant answer, here is my excuse, spin. cant answer
your question though because of investigation. but let me get out my spin. but i cant say anything more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
13. My head is spinning.
More absurd by the day, isn't it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. I watched it on TV and it made no sense...
So I had to find the transcript to see if I was the loopy one. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
14. is there anyone less eloquent?
"there was questions in people's minds"

even basic grammar eludes him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
17. I'm glad he can finally answer instead of running away as he did at first!
Whew! What a relief! His handlers have come to his rescue with an answer for him. Since he is SUCH AN HONEST AND STRAIGHTFORWARD GUY, it must have been SO HARD ON GEORGE to have to run away when he was first asked this question! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
18. Three words about the pres....full of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
19. you have to be careful about public statements - serious legal matters
ya know...like it is a concession that if he slips the noose will grow tighter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
20. "There was questions in peoples' minds"
What a fucking numbskull.

Is it too much to expect our President to understand basic English?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. No shit, they keep yelling about all those border crossers and all
that need to know English is the 'offical' language of the US - looks like they need to start at the top!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
23. This president is LOST, CONFUSED, and IN THE WAY...get the HOOK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
25. AAAARGH!!!!
I. ABSOLUTELY. HATE. BULLSHITTERS!!!

where's the "smiley" that's thumping on sand or batting on a stump or something like that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LondonReign2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
27. "in other words"
"I will say this, that after we liberated Iraq, there was questions in people's minds about the basis on which I made statements, in other words, going into Iraq."

In other words, going into Iraq???? What the hell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ammonium Donating Member (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
28. Wow...
I like how he didn't answer the question. What the hell does all of that garbage have to do the questions? The man has a fucking degree from an Ivy league school in ENGLISH!!! and he can't speak correctly!? wtfing shit is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. See what wealth and privilege bring?
Edited on Mon Apr-10-06 02:41 PM by leftchick
Welcome to DU!

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
32. Someone needs to explain to the boy king that...
"And how do you respond to the recent report by Prosecutor Fitzgerald that there is, in his words, a concerted -- "evidence of a concerted effort by the White House to punish Joseph Wilson" who, himself, has a distinguished record of government service?" is NOT a yes/no question. *snort* :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC