Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tacitical Nukes Bush Can Unleash Against Iran In Your Name

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 01:47 PM
Original message
Tacitical Nukes Bush Can Unleash Against Iran In Your Name
Edited on Mon Apr-10-06 02:02 PM by berni_mccoy
From The List of All U.S. Nuclear Weapons: http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Weapons/Allbombs.html
The following nuclear weapons have the ability to hit targets beneath the ground.

  • TYPE: YIELD -- DATE MADE; DESCRIPTION
  • ===============================================================
  • Mk-8*: 25Kt - 30Kt -- Manufactured 11/51 - 5/53; Earth penetrating weapon, gun-assembly HEU bomb, nicknamed "Elsie" (for LC - light case), 2 mods; replaced by the Mk-11

  • Mk-11*: 25Kt - 30Kt -- Manufactured 1/56 - 1957; Improved Mk-8 gun-assembly weapon, replaced Mk-8 on 1-for-1 basis; stockpiled as the "Mk-91 penetration bomb"

  • Mk-28*: 70Kt - 1.45Mt -- Manufactured 1/58 - 3/58, 8/58 - 5/66; Multipurpose TN tactical and strategic bomb; longest weapon design in U.S. (33 years); 2nd largest production run of any U.S. weapon design; Y4 was fission only; 20 mods and variants; replaced by B-61 and B-83 bombs; 1-point safety problem with primary discovered after start of initial manufacture, halting production for 5 months

  • W-30*: 300T, 500T, 4.7Kt, 19Kt manufactured 2/59 - 1/65 Multipurpose warhead: Talos SAM/SSM, XW-30-X1 TADM (Tactical Atomic Demolition Munition) warhead; Talos - 1 yield, 3 mods; TADM - 2 yields stockpiled

  • W-45*: 500 T; 1Kt, 5Kt, 8Kt, 10Kt, 15Kt - manufactured 4/62 - 1984, retired 7/67 - 9/88, 750 produced; Multipurpose UCRL designed tactical warhead; small implosion design;

  • Mk-54*: 10T - 1Kt - Manufactured 8/64 - 6/66; M-129/M-159 SADM (Special Atomic Demolition Munition) used a Mk-54 warhead package very similar to Davy Crockett; 2 mods; mechanical combination lock PAL

  • Mk-57*: 5Kt - 20Kt - Manufactured 1/63 - 5/67; Light weight multipurpose tactical strike/depth bomb; boosted implosion fission weapon; modular design, 6 mods; PAL B; 1x12.5 ft ribbon parachute; Retired in favor of B-61

  • MK/B-61: 0.3Kt - 340 Kt; Manufactured 10/66 - early 90s; Multipurpose tactical/strategic bomb; basic design adapted to many other weapon systems; 4 yields; 11 mods, 5 in service; PAL B, D, F; uses IHE in primary; parachute: 1x17 ft or 1x24 ft ribbon; longest production run of any U.S. nuclear weapon, oldest design in service; part of the U.S. "enduring stockpile"

  • B-83: low Kt to 1.2 Mt Manufactured 6/83 - 1991; Current high-yield strategic TN bomb; PAL D; uses IHE, fire resisitant pit; parachutes: 3x4 ft, 1x46 ft; 1x5 ft, 1x46 ft

  • W-86: Canceled Sept 1980 Earth penetrating warhead for the Pershing II SSM, canceled due to change in mission from hard to soft targets

  • B 90: 200 Kt Canceled 1991 USN nuclear strike/depth bomb; intended to replace Mk-57; PAL D; 1x26 ft parachute

  • W-91: 10Kt, 100Kt Canceled Sept 1991 SRAM-T (short range attack missile - tactical) warhead; SRAM-T was a SRAM II derivative for the F-15E Eagle fighter/bomber; LASL TN design orignally called "New Mexico 1"; safety features: FRP, IHE; 2 yields
  • ===============================================================

A * indicates a retired weapon.


As you can see, we've had bunker-busting Nukes for some time. Most likely weapon to be used against Iran: The MK/B-61. This WMD has bunker-busting capabilities and can have it's yield set anywhere between 0.3Kt and 350Kt. Of course, if the DoD has made some new monstrosity not listed above, then Bush would have that as an option as well.

More about the MK/B-61 here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-61 and here: http://www.brook.edu/FP/PROJECTS/NUCWCOST/lasg.htm

From the second link, a few highlights:
A central and expressed purpose of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) has always been to arrest the further evolution of the world's nuclear arsenals. This modified weapon? certified without nuclear testing and deployed after signing the CTBT?undercuts that treaty and could provide political cover to countries which have their own unsatisfied nuclear ambitions.

Earth-penetrating weapons, deployed by the Clinton adminstration in the post-Cold-War era, were rejected for deployment by Presidents Carter, Reagan, and Bush. What is the new reason to deploy these weapons? What are the new targets? What is known about the B61-11 strongly suggests that its rushed development has been motivated by a desire to target one or more non-nuclear-weapon states.

On July 8, 1996, the International Court of Justice ruled that any use or threat of use of nuclear weapons, other than possibly in the case where the very survival of a nation was threatened, was against international law. After this landmark decision, it is difficult to legally support the deployment, let alone the new development, of any tactical nuclear weapon? especially one whose development appears to have been motivated by a desire to target non-nuclear weapon states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Update to include links to B-61 info
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. The "Enduring Stockpile"
has endured too long for *'s friends in the military industrial complex. They want ALL the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tatertop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Little Boy was 16Kt, the MK/B-61 could be 340 Kt
unimaginable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. The Soviets built a 100,000 kT weapon in the '50's
dubbed it "Tsar Bomba" (King of Bombs). It was mostly a publicity stunt, I think, but a few were stockpiled for a while. The bomb weighed 60,000 lb and was nearly as big as a cement truck, IIRC. Only the TU-95 could carry it.

One of these was tested in a cleaner half-yield (50,000 kT) configuration at Novaya Zemla, as I recall.

The biggest weapon the U.S. ever built was 20,000 or 25,000 kT, I don't remember which. Long since retired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tatertop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. wow, I didn't know they built one that big
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Link to photos below
http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Russia/TsarBomba.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsar_Bomba

Interesting line from the wikipedia article:

Since 50 Mt is 2.1×10^17 joules, the average power produced during the entire fission-fusion process, lasting around 3.9×10^-8 seconds or 39 nanoseconds, was a power of about 5.3×10^24 watts or 5.3 yottawatts. This is equivalent to approximately 1% of the energy output of the Sun during the same fraction of a second. By contrast, the largest weapon ever produced by the United States, the now-decommissioned B41, had a predicted maximum yield of 25 Mt, and the largest nuclear device ever tested by the USA (Castle Bravo) yielded 15 Mt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tatertop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Measured in... yottawatts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kailassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. OMG. I think I got radiation sickness from reading that.
How evil would you have to be to want to use even a "little" nuke, let alone one ot those things.

Nuke-puke time.

:nuke: :puke: :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kicking for current discussion on Sy Hersh's article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC