T-Jeff_Dem
(28 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-09-06 01:47 PM
Original message |
| Deja Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-09-06 01:49 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Stiff fines? Wow. My wallet just went limp. |
| acmavm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-09-06 01:49 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. So, does that mean 97-1/2% of tge clowns I get e-mail from are |
| Sannum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-09-06 01:49 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. does this apply to Freepers? |
| Whoa_Nelly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-09-06 01:52 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. Lawyers are going to have fun with this one |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-09-06 01:53 PM by Whoa_Nelly
when people realize they can press charges against those who are annoy them through email, websites, etc. All sounds rather ambiguous. Have to wonder what the legal definition of "annoying" will be and how that precedent will be set. And does this insertion into the VAW act give tacit allowance to gaining the identity and location of said annoyer?
:popcorn:
on edit:
LINK to dupe?? Thx.
|
| Sannum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-09-06 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 5. Your popcorn is annoying me!! |
|
You should expect a call from my lawyer! :P
|
| Whoa_Nelly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-09-06 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 6. Since I can't really eat popcorn |
|
and my DU popcorn is a virtual snack, I think my lawer will be able to beat your lawyer to hell and back :P
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:36 PM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
