SammyBlue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-10-06 04:03 PM
Original message |
DIPLOMACY IS THE BEST AVENUE FOR PEACE -- Bush comment |
|
THIS FUCKER WOULDN'T KNOW DIPLOMACY OR PEACE IF IT BIT HIM IN HIS ALCOHOLIC, COKE ADDICTED ASSHOLE!!!
WTF!!!!
I just heard that on AAR!!!
|
eleny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-10-06 04:05 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Making up his personal relationship with reality as he goes along |
Jack Rabbit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-10-06 04:06 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Bush thinks the only real diolomat is a Cruise Missile |
lvx35
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-10-06 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. hehe. There's a cartoon in that somewhere... |
|
Colin or Condaleeza being introduced to their replacement, which is just a cruise missile with legs... :)
|
KurtNYC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-10-06 04:07 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Which is why he won't be going down THAT avenue... |
|
Diplomacy Avenue is closed. The * detour takes you right to war.
|
Duer 157099
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-10-06 04:16 PM
Response to Original message |
5. ...or, perhaps a failed war in Iraq has taught him a lesson |
|
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA, oh yeah, right
(but seriously, maybe this is his way of saying he knows he can't nuke Iran)
|
Proud Liberal Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-10-06 04:57 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Bush's approach to dealing with the "Axis of Evil" |
|
Edited on Mon Apr-10-06 05:03 PM by butlerd
1.)Iraq: "Nutcase" leader + NO WMD + NO links to Al-Queda=Invasion/Occupation
2.)Iran: "Nutcase" leader + possible WMD program development + possible ties to Al-Queda=Diplomacy
North Korea "Nutcase" leader + possible POSSESSION of WMD + threat of possible "pre-emptive" military action=Diplomacy/Ignore
Error....Does.....Not.....Compute.......................................:argh:
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:22 PM
Response to Original message |