I really hate to say it, as I thought SEIU's idea for a nationwide contest was interesting and might actually yield some interesting results (well it may yet, but not by their own hands.)
This was despite the inferior web coding, the sparse blog entries with days long gaps, and the generally low quality of most of the submissions to the contest. I still thought it might turn out OK in the end. This morning I decided that just wasn't going to happen. Instead of finding ideas that were innovative and achievable, they punted and are now touting as the 21 best some old mainstay ideas that one could argue have been around for so long, they must have major barriers to implementation. Or just not be good in the first place.
I was going to hold my tongue, but after reading the near 100% negative feedback on their own blog by some of their top idea reviewers, I think a consensus has been reached: The contest is a flop. It didn't produce any usable results, and it was not a simple case of garbage-in-garbage-out. There were worthy ideas mixed in there that were overlooked, I can attest to seeing some personally that were far better than almost all of the finalists.
Now I'm union-neutral, as I view most institutions as only as good as the people running them. (I'm also very pro-worker-safety.) So don't bother using this thread to go on an anti-union rant. That's not the issue, and you have no grounds trying to use this flop as fodder for a broader pan of union organizers. This boils down not to unions, but to a "failure of imagination" on the part of some unnamed individuals who screened the ideas before they went to the panel of judges.
It has demonstrated one thing though: It only takes a one-person thick layer to shield the world from the effects of new and original thought.
You can follow the pillory here:
http://www.sinceslicedbread.com/node/23144#comment..and see what the fuss is about here:
http://www.sinceslicedbread.com/ideas