Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If our president was insane or unfit for office, whose job would it be

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 08:41 AM
Original message
If our president was insane or unfit for office, whose job would it be
to make that determination, who would he/she tell and what process would we have to go through before he is removed?

I'm just wondering because all this talk of going into Iran with nukes when our military leaders, Congress and the public is totally opposed to it suggests that Bush is disconnected in a serious way. To make this kind of leap when the mainstream media is reporting all the misdeeds and corrupt acts from his Administration that have occurred in the last five years suggests some seriously flawed thought-process is involved. Or maybe his inner circle is responsible for keeping opposing opinions at bay, but then we have just as serious a situation on our hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Strawman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. Read Section 4 of the 25th Amendment
Edited on Wed Apr-12-06 08:46 AM by Strawman
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

It would be the Vice President's job.

The VP and a mjority of the cabinet would have to notify Congress of their determination that the President was unable to carry out his/her duties. The President could protest and then Congress has quite a bit of latitude in appointing a body (maybe even a group of psychiatrists) to determine whether in fact the President is unable to carry out his/her duties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. AAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRGGGGGGHHH!
Why did I ask?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strawman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. That's what sucks in this instance
The VP has to initiate the process, and he's nuts too. So is the cabinet.

The remedy to an out of control President and VP in this instance would be impeachement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Cheney and the leaders of Congress????
Good luck with that.

Shrub would have to be lying on the floor convulsing and foaming at the mouth - Nah, even then, the true believers wouldn't remove Dear Leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strawman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Yep. Post 2006 impeachment is the remedy here
Edited on Wed Apr-12-06 08:49 AM by Strawman
Not the 25th Amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. No, to his supporters
that would be a religious experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. The problem is...
The President can override a declaration of disability. The 25th Amendment is designed to address physical disability, such as was the case with President Wilson, and not mental or emotional disability. The president can be effectively removed from office, but if there is a conflict, it is up to Congress to effectively impeach the president. See Amendment 25, Section 4:

Section 4. Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.

Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty-eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress, within twenty-one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session, within twenty-one days after Congress is required to assemble, determines by two-thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall resume the powers and duties of his office.


If there is a conflict between the President and the rest of the Executive Branch over the President's fitness to hold office, then the President remains president on his own say-so until Congress impeaches him. If the president is really that unstable, starting this process could have disasterous consequences far beyond just letting him stay in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strawman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. What would be a better alternative?
You don't want to make it too easy to remove a President from office if his "disability" is not obvious. I'm curious what you would suggest. This is an interesting Amendment.

It seems like if the Vice President and a majority of the cabinet (these are loyalists from the President's own party) say he/she is nuts, my guess is that 2/3 of Congress would agree.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. I'm not saying this is a bad thing
I'm just pointing out that the 25th Amendment isn't suited for dealing with mental instability. And that even if the rest of the Executive Branch and two thirds of both houses of Congress agreed to remove him, the President still has power to act until actually removed, which can take almost a month to effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strawman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. My guess is that the Congress would act quickly
Edited on Wed Apr-12-06 09:27 AM by Strawman
The have to meet within 48 hours. The VP and Cabinet of have already said the President is mentally impaired. It would be over quickly.

And in the interim, I would imagine that there would be some informal, extra-legal checks on the President's ability to do anything. Kind of like when the military had an understanding to ignore any orders by Nixon to launch nukes before he was effectively forced to resign. Presidential power relies on persuasion, even the most self exectuing orders (e.g. hitting the nuclear button) require that he/she persuade members of the executive branch (including the military) to carry them out.

What's scarier to me is the fact that this process can only be initiated by Presidential loyalists. That's how a disabled president will stay in office too long. It may have happened that way in Reagan's case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daveskilt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. written before the nuclear football.
mental instability didnt have the same punch or potential for disastor 200 years ago
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strawman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. It was adopted in 1967
Edited on Wed Apr-12-06 09:33 AM by Strawman
Drafted in 1965 by Evan Bayh's dad, Birch Bayh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darkmaestro019 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
21. Wow, I was close, actually. Heh. First Officer and stuff....
So that's out. Anyone better than I apparently am at voodoo?


Oh wait, scratch that. We're not allowed to wish negative things at the Resident Weasel.

http://anniesj.livejournal.com/331112.html#cutid1 not even in a Judeo-Christian way, so I can imagine what anything less traditional would result in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
29. What if the VP is crazy too? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. It is my understanding that Woodrow Wilson
Edited on Wed Apr-12-06 09:27 AM by NYC
was incompetent (after a stroke), but that was concealed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strawman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. Yes. It would have been interesting if we had the 25th Amendment then
Edited on Wed Apr-12-06 08:53 AM by Strawman
I've also heard there were discussions of possibly having to invoke it at some point during Reagan's second term due to Alzheimer's.

I'm pretty sure it was invoked when he was shot and Poppy was "Acting President."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. Nah.
Al Haig was in charge then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #12
22. Didn't Alexander Haig declare himself acting president?
I think he did.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strawman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. Yeah, based upon all the authority that came from talking out of his ass
"I'm in charge here!" What an ass-clown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. It made me laugh at the time.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #22
30. I was a little kid when Reagan was shot
and I knew better than Haig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. He was one of the reasons for prompting the 25th
It took a few decades to get it to pass, but the idea was first floated after Wilson's stroke, when his wife was effectively running the country. A part of the reason for that is that the Constitution was not clear on what should happen. I'm not sure what prompted it to get passed, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. I think this guy has the sole authority to remove command powers based
on being mentally or medically unfit.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. ooooh ya beat me to it!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. It hardly matters anyway - all he has the power to do is relieve command
which then automatically goes to the number two officer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. If.............?
Is there really much question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
8. Didn't "Bones" die a year or so ago ? (maybe longer)..eom
Edited on Wed Apr-12-06 08:50 AM by Alamom



edit: clarity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
13. What if the one making the determination were insane, too?
Where's the section for that in the 25th Amendment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darkmaestro019 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
20. I wonder this too. Can we get Spock and Bones to remove him
from command?


(sigh) :hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genie_weenie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
26. The governments of the US
have taken great pains to ensure the America people living under their control do not have the ability to remove them besides the very controlled (and often falsified) periodic elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC