Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

D Gergen Is the Prez a Lame Duck? "I Think you can hear the Quacking Now!"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 06:20 PM
Original message
D Gergen Is the Prez a Lame Duck? "I Think you can hear the Quacking Now!"
Edited on Wed Apr-12-06 06:27 PM by leftchick
On CNN! That was his response to the newsbunny covering for wolf. Is the prez a lame duck?? Quack Quack!! I spit my drink out! He is going on for several minutes now saying the pretzeldent is in DEEP DOO DOO!

:rofl:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Heard that!!! Gergen, the conservative. He's one of 'em I respect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think he's a dead duck.
Deader'n one of those tethered ducks at Cheney's favorite "hunting" ranch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. A crazy, dead, lame duck, with his finger on the big red button.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. yoohhhh-you just ruined my moment of laughs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
24. Sorry! Long, yucky day... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh yeah, Beau-ti-ful!
He led the others with his quack - quack - quack.
quack - quack - quack, quack - quack - quack,
He led the others with his quack - quack - quack.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Lame game fowl? Cheney's trigger fnger must be itching like crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. sometimes he's lame, others, he takes a decent shot like that
I think we have reached the point where the old pols are no longer afraid of Bush. They realize he's a toothless old lion who can't even control congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hold it - that was an utterly stupid question
A lame duck President is one who cannot run again - Bush, Clinton, anyone in his second term.

That question - and the answer - was odd.

Gergen knows what a lame duck is, but I suspect the woman asking the question is not too knowledgeable. That was an incredible question. I thought it was a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I thought is was used in terms of the relevancy of their time left as well
not just if they are running again. I need to go google.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. No, it's not
All it means is that he's serving out his second term and can't run again.

Don't EVER make the mistake of thinking that google will give you accurate information, by the way. Lots of people use words or phrases incorrectly, and they'll show up in a search, but studying a little American history - in books - will give you the reality and the accuracy of the matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. you're right about the provenance, but the usage has evolved, I think.
they're implying that, as a lame duck, he's lost most of his influence, especially over his own party.


the not running again bit seems to have lost its importance, almost as if, were he still eligible to run, he'd STILL be a lame duck, cause he's so feckless, and.....lame
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. So, all of a sudden,
because he's not doing well, they notice he's a lame duck?

He became a lame duck the day after the second stolen election in 2004.

I suspect you're right, though, because these nitwits who read the news and ask questions fed to them through their earpieces are stupid.

I'm so weary of stupid people who don't even know the most basic facts of American political history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. pretty much, WRT not doing well. I don't recall them mentioning
his lame duck term until things started going south after Katrina. up until then, the media were still more evidently sycophantic than they appear to be now. not that they aren't, when push comes to shove

all one has to do to realize that is listen to the questions those college kids axed him the other day at Johns Hopkins, and contrast them to the spitballs tossed his way by the WH Press CorpsE. even the socalled tough ones never are followed up. he gets away with those inane filibusters all the time; not that they're not entertaining in a masochistic, laugh while the world is ending sort of way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Fuckface at JH
One of the most compelling lines in the Washington Post coverage of that event - the Post sucks, by the way, but you knew that - was the statement about the "audience silence at all the points where laughter should have been." The JH folks were far too hip for that bullshit.

I will never understand why the alleged journalists in this country bent over and grabbed their ankles for this sonofabitch the way they did. There is no forgiveness for their ineptitude and sycophancy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. I agree with your point about Gergen
since you have correctly pointed out the misuse of the term I thought I would add... I agree that it would have been nice if Gergen had pointed out the error rather than go with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. Gergen
He's such a quick little whore, his response - contributing to the inaccuracy - didn't surprise me, really.

But, don't you love it when these asskissers of both cheeks start piling on the "lame duck"?

Pass the popcorn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. yes indeed
at least they chose a term, wrong as it is, that points out the shithead is the loser that he is! And have you seen all of the cool photoshops of the duck in chief??

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. . . .
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. Iran
I think we should see if we can reverse his bid to nuke Iran before we can call him a lame duck. Otherwise, we might all end up DEAD ducks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
13. He better not quack around this guy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. oh my!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. AWESOME PIC!!!
:rofl:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Coming from you, that is a compliment
thanks.. I made that right after he shot that poor old man... With all the duck posts, I keep bringing him out..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. Make MORE pix dogday!!!
Gimme MORE!!! :D


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Haven't been doing much political stuff,
just started getting into it.. Here are a few

















Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. LOL! Great work!
Keep it up! :applause:

Here's my gallery, in case you're interested:

http://news.globalfreepress.com/gallery/index.php?cat=10002
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faithnotgreed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
21. leftchick - may i ask for any specifics that gergen gave for this
i would really enjoy knowing why he thinks so (and why the question was even asked)

was this about immigration
or the war
or the uncovering of the rampant lies he gave for war

or.... (so many to choose from i know but if gergen is saying it publicly i would like to hear what the reasons stated are)

thanks so much lc
my friends from north carolina....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. all of the above
everything the newsbunny lobbed at him he admitted the chimp is in deep shit. Poll numbers, Pre-war intel, rummy, the fate of Iraq, all of it! Bad, bad bad is the impression Gergen gave. I think now is the time for the next terra attack.

:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faithnotgreed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. thank you so much - glad to hear any sanity coming through the
corporate media
for those moments anyway

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
28. quack! quack! quack! quack!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
32. Strangely enough, that works to his advantage on the Iran issue...
because now, he could give a shit what Congress or Public Opinion has to say - he'll never face election again.

Oh, when it comes to getting legislation passed, he's a lame duck, but when it comes to starting WW III, he's the cock of the walk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC