Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Raw Story: US Using Iraqi Terror Groups In Iran - By Larisa Alexandrovna

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:15 AM
Original message
Raw Story: US Using Iraqi Terror Groups In Iran - By Larisa Alexandrovna
Edited on Thu Apr-13-06 11:30 AM by kpete
US outsourcing special operations, intelligence to Iraq terror group, current and former intelligence officials say

Larisa Alexandrovna
Published: Thursday April 13, 2006

The Pentagon is bypassing official US intelligence channels and turning to a dangerous and unruly cast of characters in order to create strife in Iran in preparation for an attack, former and current intelligence officials say.

One of the operational assets being used by the Defense Department is a right-wing terrorist organization known as Mujahedeen-e Khalq (MEK), which is being “run” in two southern regional areas of Iran, both bordering Pakistan. They are Balucistan, a Sunni stronghold, and Khuzestan, a Shia region where a series of recent attacks has left many dead and hundreds injured in the last three months.

One former counterintelligence official, who wished to remain anonymous due to the sensitivity of the information, describes the Pentagon as pushing MEK shortly after the invasion of Iraq in 2003. The drive to use the insurgent group was said to have been advanced by the Pentagon under the influence of the Vice President’s office and opposed by the State Department, National Security Council and then-National Security Advisor, Condoleezza Rice.

“The MEK is run by a brother and sister who were given bases in northern Baghdad by Saddam,” the intelligence official explains. “The US army secured a key MEK facility 60 miles northwest of Baghdad shortly after the 2003 invasion, but they did not secure the MEK and let them basically be because Wolfowitz was thinking ahead to Iran.”
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/US_outsourcing_special_operations_intelligence_gathering_0413.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ta dah! - kpete makes an appearance
reading now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. We didn't expect those millions approved for use by Condi to promote
democracy in Iran to be used to hand out refrigerator magnets. Can't say I'm surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bear425 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. 5th k/r
Edited on Thu Apr-13-06 11:30 AM by bear425
-snip-

In a stunning repeat of pre-war Iraq activities, the Bush administration continues to publicly call for action and pursue diplomatic solutions to allegations that Iran is bomb-ready. Behind the scenes, however, the administration is already well underway and engaged in ground operations in Iran.

-snip-

emphasis mine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. Isn't that considered "sponsoring terrorism"?
Creating internal strife in a country with state sponsored groups is what Bush is crying about when others do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. and it has been the modus operandi of this sort of operation for
a long time. Central and South America experienced similar "destabilization" campaigns via right-wing geurilla factions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. more from CSM 12/03:Inside a group caught between three powers
~snip~
Officially, both the US and Iran label the MKO a terrorist group. The US-appointed Iraq Governing Council concurs: Citing the "black history of this terrorist organization" and its years of working closely with Mr. Hussein, it has ordered the expulsion of the MKO from Iraq by the end of this year.

But the MKO's fate is unclear. While the Iraqis want it disbanded, the politically savvy group still has support among some congressmen and Pentagon officials, who see it as a potential tool against Iran, a country which President Bush calls part of an "axis of evil."

Some MKO tips have led to recent revelations about key aspects of Iran's clandestine nuclear program, though many others have proven unreliable. Long a diplomatic hot potato - which Tehran has offered to solve, by exchanging MKO militants for Al Qaeda players now in Iran - the MKO continues to complicate US-Iran-Iraq relations.

~snip~

The Pentagon - after bombing MKO camps in Iraq in the first stages of the invasion - quickly worked out a truce with the group some civilian hawks in the Pentagon believe should be supported and turned into a US tool of opposition against the Islamic Republic of Iran.

much more:http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/1231/p10s01-woiq.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B3Nut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Jeepers...
could we be any more ham-handed in middle-eastern affairs? Good night Charlie Brown...

Todd in Beerbratistan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. Seems they had the MEK/MKO in mind early on
Edited on Thu Apr-13-06 07:42 PM by Emit
Being discussed here:

robertpaulsen:
"It's been on the drawing board since PNAC was created in the '90s, but they've been planning this militarily since at least 2003!"


More here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=923696&mesg_id=926173

On edite, Or maybe even in '01 or '02:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=923696&mesg_id=926891
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
6. is the US supporting radical islamic terrorists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dunvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Short analysis: Yes.
Edited on Thu Apr-13-06 11:44 AM by Dunvegan
Longer analysis: If they are working for our intel spooks, they shall be defined in Foggy Bottom terms as either, (1) Friendly Operatives, or (2) Freedom Fighters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. UPDATE: CHENEY ORDERED USE OF TERROR GROUPS
Edited on Thu Apr-13-06 12:48 PM by kpete
“We disarmed of major weapons but not small arms. Rumsfeld was pushing to use them as a military special ops team, but policy infighting between their camp and Condi, but she was able to fight them off for a while,” said the intelligence official. According to still another intelligence source, the policy infighting ended last year when Donald Rumsfeld, under pressure from Vice President Cheney, came up with a plan to “convert” the MEK by having them simply quit their organization.

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/US_outsourcing_special_operations_intelligence_gathering_0413.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. Jimmy Carter tried to stop these outrages.
The Black Agencies brought him down for his efforts.
Jimmy Carter was the first Democrat to be Swiftboated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
12. Hey kpete, sorry I missed this thread before.
Thanks for posting this! Everyone needs to read this!

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Hi and thanks for the comment
Larisa continues to amaze me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. It was a pro-Khuzestan separatist group, armed by Saddam
That carried the Iranian Embassy Siege in London in 1980. The SAS killed all but one of the hostage-takers as part of Operation Nimrod.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/static/in_depth/uk/2000/iranian_embassy_siege/intro.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
15. interesting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I saw that earlier
hmmmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Odd, no? And a whole blog of his own, and a DU entry
all asking "why would someone tell you"? odd really, but anticipated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC