on the off chance that a democrat wins in 2008,

[unblock]

and the democrat asks the shrubbies for all documents related to 9/11 and the war on terror and the plane outing and spygate and so on ....

surely the shrubbies would refuse to comply. heck, i think i recall bush senior refusing to turn over some national security related info to clinton.

however, given that there's a war on terror that will still be a-ragin', could/should the democratic president arrest, detain, deprive attorney contact, and torture the shrubbies for information? OBVIOUSLY, they've based their ENTIRE legitimacy on the notion that they have all this information, and surely that information would be important to a democratic president, too.....

right?

[OPERATIONMINDCRIME]

1. A Little More Optimism Would Be Nice n/t

[unblock]

3. see reply #2 ...

perhaps i should have said, "on the off chance that they LET a democrat win"?

i'm very optimistic about our political chances, i think a democrat will get more votes for the 5th presidential election in a row in 2008.

but occupying the oval office afterward is a whole nother ballgame.

[OPERATIONMINDCRIME]

5. Ohhhhhh Hehehe. Gotcha!

My bad :)

[Talismom]

2. I'm getting pretty sure that they're banking on nevery allowing a free and

fair election again, so this scenario would never occur.

[seabeyond]

4. first term he started sealing more documents and for longer

periods than ever before. you would have to go back to do research, but he was havign stuff sealed, even clinton stuff sealed clinton didnt want sealed. and his father stuff sealed. and then he placed someone head of the place that everyone was concerned with. we are looking at that stuff locked up not to see the light of day