Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Don sL-IMUS: "I want that other pope back"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-16-06 09:06 PM
Original message
Don sL-IMUS: "I want that other pope back"
He was referring to the recently deceased one. I'll go one better: John XXIII.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-16-06 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. I know how he feels... (and I defiitely know how YOU feel)...
Edited on Sun Apr-16-06 09:12 PM by hlthe2b
How things might have been different with John XXIII.

Instead we have Ratzinger, the preeminent member of the nazi "youth."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-16-06 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. i`ll go one better
get rid of the pope and the Vatican. what a racket these guys have been pulling for almost two thousand years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PublicWrath Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-16-06 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Boot the Pope! Boot the Pope! Boot the Pope! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PublicWrath Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-16-06 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Actually, John Paul I had some amazingly refreshing ideas,
He was pro birth control. He was pro gay. Etc. And he was fairly young for a Pope and pretty healthy, too.

He lasted about a month. No autopsy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-16-06 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. No autopsy~ my, my Huum.

Didn't the Chimp have a private meeting with the Cardinals before the vote for Benny,the Pope chosen by Bush/Blair?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-16-06 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Bush had nothing to do with it.
Jeez.

The guy's had his sleazy fingers in a lot of things but pope-picking isn't one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-16-06 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. It's not like the Bush family aren't buds with Pope Ratzo:
Neil Bush, Ratzinger co-founders
Neil Bush, the president's controversial younger brother, six years ago joined the cardinal who this week became Pope Benedict XVI as a founding board member of a little known Swiss ecumenical foundation. ...
http://www.nynewsday.com/news/nationworld/world/ny-wochar214226829apr21,0,2092802,print.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-16-06 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Right, there you have it.
I'm convinced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mediaman007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-16-06 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. You don't know that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-16-06 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Oh brother.
I don't know he doesn't create tsunamis and hurricanes either.

I thought this was a No Tinfoil Zone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PublicWrath Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-16-06 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. The funny thing about the official Catholic propaganda on John Paul 1
Edited on Sun Apr-16-06 10:50 PM by PublicWrath
Is that it goes way, way, way, out of its way to say he wouldn't have changed a thing. It's kinda chilling. He was famous in Italy for being a rebel and was continuously quoted while Archbishop of Venice as taking stands on issues in direct opposition to the Pope. Even got reprimanded. And yet, history has recorded him as being kind of lukewarm and a standard issue priest. There is much reason to believe that he was planning BIG changes, had perhaps informed the inner circle of Vatican power and was on the threshold of making an announcement of some sort. He was a nice man, too. Laughed a lot. Built a lot of orphanages and spoke out against old ideas that stigmatized unwed mothers.

Also jogged a lot.

You see, as an autonomous "state" Vatican City is not under any obligation to have autopsies, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC