Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP: Rafsanjani Scoffs at Talk of U.S. Attack

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 11:06 AM
Original message
AP: Rafsanjani Scoffs at Talk of U.S. Attack
Rafsanjani Scoffs at Talk of U.S. Attack


Monday April 17, 2006 4:46 PM

AP Photo KUW101

By DIANA ELIAS

Associated Press Writer

KUWAIT CITY (AP) - Iran's former president said Monday that talk of a U.S. military attack
on Iran was overblown because it would be 'too dangerous" and no Persian Gulf countries would
join forces with the United States.

A few reports in the U.S. media have said the United States was developing contingency plans
to use military force against Iran if it continues to challenge attempts by the West and the U.N.
nuclear watchdog agency to force it to abandon its uranium enrichment program.
<snip>
"Reports about plans for an American attack on Iran are incorrect," former President Hashemi
Rafsanjani said in an appearance before Kuwait's parliament. "We are certain that Americans
will not attack Iran because the consequences would be too dangerous."

On Sunday, he said he believed the United States was ``incapable of taking a risk or engaging
in a new war in the region without discussing the subject seriously."
<snip>

Full article: http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-5760950,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is going to be a long-run situation.
As the world starts to run out of oil, the pressure on Iran is going to be tremendous. If the Iranians want to keep the U.S. out, they are going to have to think of the long-term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. "because the consequences would be too dangerous"
yeah, but tell that to the crazies in the WH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC