Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Shock and Awe" Strategist Harlan Ullman Says Buck Bush, Not Rumsfeld

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 03:53 PM
Original message
"Shock and Awe" Strategist Harlan Ullman Says Buck Bush, Not Rumsfeld
From: The Washington Note
April 17, 2006
"Shock and Awe" Strategist Harlan Ullman Says Buck Bush, Not Rumsfeld

Defense strategist Harlan Ullman writes a regular "Owls and Eagles" column for the Washington Times, and I frequently learn a great deal from it.

I have come by an early draft of what will appear in his column tomorrow -- titled tentatively "It is Bush's War, Not Rumsfeld's".

I won't print the whole article, but I will post some of it and add the link to the Washington Times when it is up tomorrow.

Nonetheless, Ullman makes several points that should be considered -- - particularly that that this was a Bush/Cheney war:
Last week's political sandstorm in Washington swirled around Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld's future. A handful of retired general officers, though no admirals yet, called for the secretary to go on the grounds of mishandling the war in Iraq. President Bush predictably offered strong support for Mr. Rumsfeld as did a handful of other retired flag officers.

In this brouhaha, three important ingredients are so far missing in action. First is recognizing that the war in Iraq is Mr. Bush's, not Mr. Rumsfeld's. Second, accountability for the errors, misjudgments and mistakes in conducting that war and its aftermath cannot responsibly be laid at the feet of only one person. Third, we continue to ignore what lies ahead in Iraq, an ignorance that could prove fatal to the entire endeavor.


more at:
http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/001347.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Haw-haw, Will * be his own fall-guy? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Buck Bush - I agree! He's responsible for all the bad decisions
that were made and continue to be made. :applause: Congress, are you listening?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think they see Rummy as the soft underbelly of the Bushies
The first domino to fall, so to speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. "Bush's Folly," I've been calling this debacle,. Although "folly" seems...
... like too mild a word, considering the harm he's done in lives, dollars, reputation, America's very ability to lead in the future (as we're seeing right now, with Iran).

But "Bush's Clusterfuck" doesn't really work in polite company.

:grr:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bulsh*t.
Edited on Mon Apr-17-06 04:15 PM by sendero
.... go do some reading about Rummy's military philosophy. He's totally into the "small, mobile, intelligent" fewer men more technology theory of combat.

It's proven to be a miserable failure, and he owns it, not Bush.

It's Bush's folly that we went to war at all, but plenty of the blame for how it's gone down is all Rummy's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is a lie, designed to deflect attention away from
Rumsfailed.

Bush did not plan this war. He does not have the mental capacity to do so. Bush is not capable of building a fort with Lincoln Logs.

This is Rumsfailed & Cheney, all the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bingo, I am tired of Rummy taking the heat for Bush.... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. Buck Bush, Fuck Fush, or...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC