Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tweety' logic - "I wish we heard more from Generals, less from idealogues"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 04:34 PM
Original message
Tweety' logic - "I wish we heard more from Generals, less from idealogues"
In discussing the basic fact that the IDEALOGUES were CORRECT about Iraq. Too bad, he says. If only the Generals had just stood up BEFORE the war!

So...the idealogues were CORRECT. But too bad we spoke up? How about, too bad you didn't listen to us, you stupid fucking Bush choad-slurper! WTF? We spoke up, we were right...but it was only us, so we didn't count.

*whacka whacka whacka!*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Before Bush got RID of those generals
they WEREN'T idealouges, Tweety!

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. I know what you mean. There's a related note that always bugs me.
As the Bush Imperial ship slips beneath the waves, who do we hear from...? The former neocons and hawks. We get to listen to them pontificate endlessly on why the scheme is failing, and what we should do in reponse. We get to hear neocons like Fukuyama and Bill Kristol endlessly speculate about why their obviously moronic "plans" have fallen apart, while the people who had enough basic intelligence and forsight to describe the problems BEFORE THEY HAPPENED continue to be ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Except there WERE generals speaking against Bush's strategy and
Edited on Mon Apr-17-06 04:49 PM by blm
who threw their support to Kerry back in 2003 and 2004. Tweety CHOSE TO IGNORE THEM and downplayed their import, while giving Tommy Franks and Bush loyalists all the airtime they wanted to LIE repeatedly, especially after Kerry called Bush on Tora Bora during the debates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. He was great with Holbrooke. He actually let him talk.
And Holbrooke is a smart guy. Holbrooke said the Generals would have to step down before they could speak against Rumsfeld.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. Funny how it's OK to make politically ideological remarks while in uniform
... if they're the 'correct' remarks.
The chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Marine Gen. Peter Pace, was quick to defend Rumsfeld at a Department of Defense news briefing. When a reporter asked Rumsfeld if, in a month when several generals had called for his head, he wasn't hurting the war effort by hanging on to his job, Pace responded before Rumsfeld could: "As far as Peter Pace is concerned, this country is exceptionally well served by <Rumsfeld>. Nobody -- nobody -- works harder than he does to take care of the PFCs and lance corporals and lieutenants and captains."
WHahuhh???

Let that be a lesson to y'all! It's FORBIDDEN to make political statements when in uniform .... unless those statements are approved by the Republican Party!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. Geeesh! I remember Matthews interviewing Gen. Clark before the war
He is a general ya know. And I guess Holbrooke can't remember that either.

Besides, Zinni and Clark testified that this war was a bad idea...in 2002.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC