Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How Reagan and Bush Helped Spread AIDS, a perspective

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
PatrioticLeftie Donating Member (909 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 12:41 AM
Original message
How Reagan and Bush Helped Spread AIDS, a perspective
Now, don't think I'm accusing Reagan and Bush of infecting themselves with AIDS and personally spreading it and then (Somehow) cured themselves, or anything of that sort.

No, Reagan and Bush were and are guilty of the next possible mean: inaction. It was years before Reagan even mentioned the HIV virus and then it was only in answer to a question, by which time tens of thousands had died with little to no knowledge of their disease. Reagan also said, "abstinence was better than a cure". While it is a good idea to halt the spread of a virus, it does send a negative message to those already infected.

Bush offers the same stance, that abstinence will work, and that that's enough. No, unfortunately, it is not enough, because not everyone who is infected knows they are. Besides, there is more than one way to become infected (Syringe, blood, etc).

It's the concept of "The less we know, the safer we are". Following such a rule only forces one to delve further and further into denial, until any realization of reality is a much larger and dangerous force. Some people continue to believe that AIDS only applies to homosexuals. The fact that there are people who still believe this is frightening in of itself, since they are bound to know even less.

The more we know about AIDS, and all other ailments and afflictions, the better we can be prepared to prevent or deal with them.

Luckily, today's HIV positive person is much better off then their 1980's counterpart. Vaccines have developed to much smaller and more effective doses. People who are positive may even live relatively normal lives, with a few major exceptions.

I recently listened to a speaker who had been infected with HIV/AIDS; he had been irresponsible and as a result became infected. His life was turned upside down, before he had quite a bit of money, but the drugs he takes to stifle the virus (There are multiple) were expensive already (Around $1200 a month) and were only rising in cost (A big hat tip to the Bush Administration, gotta keep those tax cuts safe, I see!). Despite all these advances, it is still the life-changing occurrence it was before.

A film I saw earlier today, "Common Threads" is a very informative piece, and recommend its viewing (Warning: It is sure to tug at heartstrings!). By 1989, over 100,000 people, that's one hundred THOUSAND people, had died from the HIV/AIDS virus, with little being done and the government hadn't even officially recognized it as a threat.

Since 1981, over 25 million people worldwide have died from the disease. And more than two decades later, still no cure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. I have always held reagan and his cohorts responsbile for many, many
needless deaths, and only belief in kharmic payback kept me from total depression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crizzo5137 Donating Member (235 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. Go out and rent
And the Band Played On... Shows how the CDC had no budget for a gay disease until it started hitting the hetero world...


and yeah, Ronnie 'just' might have been able to stop this...or at least showed some interest... But hey, I suffer with it now hoping he is buring in hell...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zinfandel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. Spread it through the "undesirables" minorities, gays & intravenous
Edited on Tue Jan-10-06 02:58 AM by Zinfandel
drug users...and it worked!

And why not, in 1980 they got (by deceit, of arms gifts to Iran) their man (Reagan) in power, no real questions were ever asked...

Better to stop it all ASAP, promiscuous sex...Oh dear, sex, was "bringing down control of the country" (get real)... The "60s" freaked them out but good!

It changed everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
4. It wasn't the inaction so much...
...as the unchallenged and implicit assumption that AIDS victims deserved it.

Oh well, you should've just said "no." Sorry, it's your fault you are going to die.

I don't think anyone who was working in the healthcare professions during those horrible times will ever forget.

I was working in medical labs and blood banks and AIDS devestated our hemophilia patients. What made it worse was that there was this attitude in some places that it was the gay people who were killing them.

I think most of the gay men and people with drug problems among my peers died. Our friends would die of AIDS, we knew it, more people suspected it, but nothing at all would be said of it.

There is much I can't forgive.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mogster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 03:18 AM
Response to Original message
5. Here's a snippet from a press conference in 1982
When AIDS are about to break out, with Reagan's press spokesman Larry Speakes:

Q: Larry, does the President have any reaction to the announcement from the Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta, that AIDS is now an epidemic and have over 600 cases?
MR. SPEAKES: What's AIDS?
Q: Over a third of them have died. It's known as "gay plague." (Laughter.) No, it is. I mean it's a pretty serious thing that one in every three people that get this have died. And I wondered if the President is aware of it?
MR. SPEAKES: I don't have it. Do you? (Laughter.)
Q: No, I don't.
MR. SPEAKES: You didn't answer my question.
Q: Well, I just wondered, does the President ...
MR. SPEAKES: How do you know? (Laughter.)
Q: In other words, the White House looks on this as a great joke?
MR. SPEAKES: No, I don't know anything about it, Lester.
Q: Does the President, does anyone in the White House know about this epidemic, Larry?
MR. SPEAKES: I don't think so. I don't think there's been any ...
Q: Nobody knows?
MR. SPEAKES: There has been no personal experience here, Lester.
Q: No, I mean, I thought you were keeping ...
MR. SPEAKES: I checked thoroughly with Dr. Ruge this morning and he's had no - (laughter) - no patients suffering from AIDS or whatever it is.
Q: The President doesn't have gay plague, is that what you're saying or what?
MR. SPEAKES: No, I didn't say that.
Q: Didn't say that?
MR. SPEAKES: I thought I heard you on the State Department over there. Why didn't you stay there? (Laughter.)
Q: Because I love you Larry, that's why (Laughter.)
MR. SPEAKES: Oh I see. Just don't put it in those terms, Lester. (Laughter.)
Q: Oh, I retract that.
MR. SPEAKES: I hope so.
Q: It's too late.

Reagan, as gay activists still angrily point out, never mentioned the word in public until 1987, by which time about 60,000 cases had been diagnosed, of whom half had died.

The lack of significant federal funding to combat AIDS is cited by many as a major factor in the dramatic spread of the disease.

In the critical years of 1984-1985, according to his White House physician, Reagan thought of AIDS as though "it was measles and would go away".

Found on tompaine.com in 2004.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. Don't disagree with anything you've said...
...but you left out a lot. IMHO, the way the Left handled the AIDs crisis is at the germ of why they lost complete power. In a nutshell, they were too politically correct about those bathhouses and about saying anything derogatory about the gay lifestyle. How can people trust a party that would opt for politics over a public safety & health issue? Neither the Republicans nor the Democrats showed leadership during this terrible crisis.

But there were heroes. And Randy Shilts documented them in, "And the Band Played On."

If you want to see evidence of Liberal Media, you'll find it when you see the made for t.v. version of "And the Band Played On" and compare it to the book version.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. ..another RepubliCON, another costly mistake...
Costly in terms of dollars and, of course, lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
8. "They just didn't care." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
9. I will never forget this.
One of my strongest memories from my childhood was sitting at the dinner table and hearing the Bush solution for the AIDS crisis:

"Put them (the gays) all on a secluded island."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC