stopbush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-17-06 06:27 PM
Original message |
Wolf: "Bad Polls For * and the REPUBLICAN-LED Congress" |
|
Didn't he get today's memo?
I'll take it. Every drip helps.
|
handsignals4theblind
(90 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-17-06 06:46 PM
Response to Original message |
1. so what- You have no Oppositon- just corporate dominated Democrats |
|
The USA needs a party that backs labour as a credible opposition. The Democrats have been a joke since 1968 and suck up to the same corporate sponsors-----a useless opposition that follows polls, has little principles and are nothing more than Republican lite. After all the over rated Clinton was the one that opened up NAFTA and never vetoed the class oriented legislation that attacked those on welfare.
America your not that politically sophisticated
|
SoFlaJet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-17-06 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
but we have zero tolerance for the likes of you-this is no time to be spouting off about a third party.Either vote dem or repub-no other has a chance.So..if you like the way things have been going for the past 5 and a half years vote green or whatever because you're only helping the GOP with your illogical stance.
|
DanCa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-17-06 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. But ask yourself Would Kerry have nominated Sam Alito to the Supremes? |
|
Edited on Mon Apr-17-06 06:51 PM by DanCa
I object to the term republican lite. John Kerry would have never had place Sam Alito on the court.
|
lvx35
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-17-06 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
And the big thing that the third party crowd misses is how much we can do WITHIN the Democratic party to make positive changes through primaries, actism, and that sort of thing. The dems are sensitive to their constituents, we just need to win hearts and minds in the party with postive causes.
|
LisaM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-17-06 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. Or John Roberts either. And we'd be back on Kyoto too. |
|
Further, I don't think South Dakota would have passed its Rapist Protection Act if they didn't think there was a sympathetic Supreme Court at the end of the appeal process.
You'd have to be pretty far on the fringes to think that Kerry and * would govern the same way.
|
QC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-17-06 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
Ikonoklast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-17-06 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
9. How's things in Canada lately? |
|
Hear they went hard right last election. Not a majority, but a plurality using the same tactics as were used here. How's that working out for you?
Glass houses and all that.
|
MasonJar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-17-06 07:06 PM
Response to Original message |
7. This democratic underground; we approve of Democrats here. |
|
John Kerry is one of the most consistently liberal voters in the Senate. Al Gore may be the leading environmental spokesman on the planet.
|
stopbush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-17-06 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. ????? I don't understand your post. |
|
Edited on Mon Apr-17-06 07:18 PM by stopbush
The point of my OP was that this was the first time that I've heard Blitzer attached the word "Republican" to bad Congressional poll numbers. In the past, it's been, "*'s numbers are bad, but those for Congress are even worse."
The good news is that the MSM is now developing a story line that says "Rs are in big trouble in Nov." Tagging the Congress as R might mean that the MSM is looking for a D takeover in abig way.
That's why I said I'd take the drip.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:16 AM
Response to Original message |