Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

More WMF problems for Microsoft

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 08:38 AM
Original message
More WMF problems for Microsoft
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1009-6024931.html

Just days after Microsoft rushed out a patch to fix a critical Windows flaw related to the processing of Windows Meta File images, two more problems with the component were flagged.

Oh. Good. Who else is going to lose money because of this?

No wonder security remains a hot IT commodity. Make a pig-pen of a product and the pigs will make it a self-fulfilling "revenue" stream...

Trouble is, that's costly for businesses - most of them, anyway - are looking for methods to cut costs (e.g. offshoring and offpeopling.) Using Microsoft products at this point is hardly cost-effective as you need people around to keep testing MS patches to determine if the damn things won't break the systems or not, downtime isn't good either... and implementing the patches with great care so they don't break the systems (and Microsoft's fluffed up there too!). And now that patches can make things worse... corporations need to do more than find novel ways of nixing employees if they want to remain profitable. (Which will ultimately be impossible; no employees means the ex-employees have no income to spend. No money to spend on the products the businesses sell. In turn the businesses go under and the economy suffers. What's the point of offering something if people can't afford it? (Which means globalization is going to fail too.) Oops, I digressed. Sorry!)

Sorry to be potentially annoying (it's inevitable that, in a nation of 350 million, somebody's going to get annoyed at some point), but I'd fathom that many corporate execs are even more annoyed over Microsoft's constant techno-gaffes. Microsoft is depended upon in the industry, that is incontrovertible! Why can't Bill be hauled off to jail? He's ultimately responsible for the actions of his company; and he's annoyed a lot of folks over the decades with second rate shoddy products that sell solely because they look glossy and appeal to the lowest common denominator. (Heck, anyone else remember how Microsoft promoted Windows 2000 by dissing its own Windows 95?! No other company would survive if they did that...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bill annoyed them under his own name, so it's legal.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC