Dems should insist that NSA abuses be resolved before the Alito vote.

[Junkdrawer]

It's clear this is an Imperial Presidency judge and he should not be able to cast the deciding vote on separation of powers.

Absolute rock-bottom minimum.

[MindPilot]

1. Yep, already sent my email to DiFi about that

It asked to delay the Alito hearings until the NSA wiretap issue is investigated.

[Junkdrawer]

9. She seems to have pursued him on this point...

and promises more to come...

[European Socialist]

2. no brainer --to bold for the wimpy Dems

[ThomWV]

3. Insist to who? Frist?

To the people? Who would you suggest "Democrats" insist to?

We do not set the agenda and most people do not know or care how the system works and how easily the miniority view can be ignored.

[Junkdrawer]

4. ..or else Filibuster...

Make sure this is seen as a reasonable demand that was rejected before a Filibuster.

[Crazy Dave]

5. Politicians have better things to do than to listen to the people....

...that elected them. Who has the time when you have to do publicity stunts, then go to fund raisers, and then make sure you get your face on as many TV cameras as you can?
Who has time to do their job with a schedule like that?

[seabeyond]

6. oh oh oh repugs f*in us again, lets go after the dems

come on everyone jump on board. lets bash dems because of what repugs do. hooooo yah

[Junkdrawer]

8. I'm suggesting a Democratic strategy...what do you suggest?

:shrug:

[mod mom]

7. AMEN TO THAT! If they spied on Kerry Campaign, which might have effected

the outcome of the election (READ: KERRY EVEN WON BY LARGER MARGINS THAT PREVIOUSLY THOUGHT), why should the fraudulently elected commander n' thief chose a second SC Justice?