Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is the caliber of our military steadily declining under Bush?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 07:58 PM
Original message
Is the caliber of our military steadily declining under Bush?
I know two people who build the huge diesel engines used by navy ships and submarines. Working on these engines is highly skilled labor and is not learned in the course of a few months. Over the last five years the number of calls they have received from the coast guard and navy ships has skyrocketed. The navy no longer has a specialized training program for this- people just learn by doing or hopefully from more experienced people. If an engine isn't working and no one can fix it, the manufacturer actually has to go on board the vessel to work on it and train the staff.

The two people are Republicans with military backgrounds and they are appalled by what they see as a real decline in quality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. If these Repuglicans are seeing this.....and admitting it
then our military is in real trouble....

The question is are these Republicans ready to vote Dem in November?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I don't know but it would take a lot to make them ashamed
of the military- and this has made them ashamed. They know first hand that the notion that Republicans are good for the security of our country is utterly false, because they see the mismanagement every day, and they've been in this line of work for 20 years or more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. it's in far worse shape than when he seized power
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Not to mention the shortage of lower-rank officers
Edited on Thu Apr-20-06 08:04 PM by Canuckistanian
Or the rapidly declining recruitment numbers. Or the shortage of basic equipment. Or the outsourcing of military jobs with private firms. Or the.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. if you cut in half you could raise the quality
Edited on Thu Apr-20-06 08:05 PM by maxsolomon
and lower the cost.

but then we couldn't swagger around freeing people right & left.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. When Clinton left office I remember people griping...
about how he used up almost all of our cruise missles.

There can't be many left now. Plus we must be running awful low on humvees, ammunition, smart bombs, foriegn support, not to mention having lost 2500 of our best and brightest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I think I read that National Guard Units take their own
equipment and then leave it there when they come home. I know that much of their equipment is old but when they come home it has to be replaced. I doubt that *ss is doing that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sweet Pea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. Nothing strange
The military has been cutting back on occupation specialties for a number of years now, preferring to utilize civilian contractors and technical rep teams to perform any number of repairs/maintenance. The US Navy command ship in the Med, USS Mount Whitney, is half-crewed my civilian mariners.

BTW, I am a reserve officer and and still up on many of the fleet things that are going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I guess I am getting the manufacturer's perspective
These men learned their occupation in the navy, then went to work for the manufacturer of the engines. That's the career path they expect to see. I haven't heard them mention civilian contractors though, just undertrained military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daphne08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. There are jobs that just should NOT be outsourced, no matter
the cost (and I'm not a fan of all this "outsourcing-insourcing" crap anyway).

It is just plain dangerous to fiddle around with our military defense by trying to save a little money.

Just my opinion.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Ding..Ding...you get the prize....
Tell me what other country does this? I just can't imagine China doing this or even Russia....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinbgoode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'll ask the Boy Scouts. . .
they are all we have left here to defend the Homeland.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. Where are they getting their current people from? Pray tell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I have no idea.
People used to be promised that they would learn a specialized skill in the military- a poor man's college. If that is no longer the case, what appeal is there for anyone to join?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. When folks are unemployed and/or working minimum wage...
...the offer of very good pay and incentives starts to look pretty good. Even the $250,000 insurance policy allows the new recruit to believe that if he gets killed his family will be taken care of.

Even someone dead set against the war but facing poor job prospects may be willing to hold their nose and enlist.

Officers are going on active duty from the service academies and ROTC programs...they owe a certain number of years in return for their education.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. so much for "be all that you can be"
I guess its the Repub idea of helping out the poor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
14. Yes....trained officers and enlisted personnel are getting out....
...as soon as they can. The multiple tours to the Middle East have taken a real toll aside from the dead, wounded, and future PTSD cases.

Our weaknesses have also been exposed for all to see...lack of armor on personnel carriers and humvees, and lack of personal armor for the troops. Our top-of-the-line tank has also proven vulnerable to anti-tank rockets fired into the lightly armored rear compartment. Additionally, the tactics we've used during the occupation have been absolutely deplorable and have resulted in a large increase in the number of insurgents.

We should NEVER have gone into that country in the first place, and now we're paying the price in terms of reduced readiness and morale.

Thanks, Herr Bush, for all that you've done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. The Abrams M1A1 tank vulnerability reminds me
of the British heavy cruisers in WW1 that were lightly armored right in the area of the turrets and ammunition compartments. It didn't take long for the Kaiserliche Hochseeflotte to figure that out! I think the Brits lost 2 or three of them at Jutland.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC