Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Executive Orders.... seriously, I need some help with this one

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
MissMillie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 08:22 AM
Original message
Executive Orders.... seriously, I need some help with this one
Has there ever been a ruling by the Supreme Court on the constitutionality of an order written by the a President that circumvents laws made by our legislative branch?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Off the top of my head...no. Mainly because EOs
are the President's sole domain. But the Pres is limited with these as to who in gov't the EOs are permitted to apply to. The Pres wouldn't have authority to write an EO that would rule of Senators or Represenatives. But he/she can put EOs in that apply to staff in the administration.

Is that muddy enough?

Is there a specific EO that you have in mind?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMillie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. No, it just seems to me that these give the president a blank check
I keep hearing about the executive order for phone tapping, but there's a law on the books for that, so how does the Prez get away w/ writing an executive order that circumvents existing law?

How is that constitutional?

How does the very existence of Executive Orders remain true to the system of checks and balances set up by our founding fathers?

I'm not necessarily putting up an argument here. I truly want to be educated about this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. believe the 'faith based initiative' was an EO after congress
refused to pass it several times. This would be a case of an EO making law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Village Idiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. Not that I recall - and I don't believe that you will see one soon...
Edited on Fri Apr-21-06 09:02 AM by Village Idiot
I believe that the idea is to OWN the judicial branch and play up the "unitary executive" to the point that by the time the Dems get the House or the Senate (or both?) back, the legislative branches will be largely unnecessary. They are almost there, and with the continued abdication of responsibility and broadened Imperial GWOT, it would not be too difficult to envision the current presidunce being "asked" to stay on after 2008 because of "national security concerns."

Welcome to the PNAC New World Order...

People have a hard time comparing any president to Hitler, but the only differences I see between Hitler and the Shrub are that Hitler was a teatotaling vegetarian...oh, ya - and Hitler actually created jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMillie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Please understand
executive orders concern me no matter who sits in the oval office.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC