Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Political Notes: Meat company officials put the heat on council (Smithfield before the Prince George

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 07:47 PM
Original message
Political Notes: Meat company officials put the heat on council (Smithfield before the Prince George

http://www.gazette.net/stories/041708/prinnew190047_32366.shtml

by Daniel Valentine | Political notes

Local and national officials for the Smithfield Foods Inc. meat company appeared before the Prince George’s County Council last week to say the council’s involvement in a labor dispute was not kosher.

In November, the council passed a resolution denouncing the company for allegedly disrupting efforts by workers to form a union at a pork processing plant in Tar Heel, N.C. The council unanimously passed the resolution Nov. 20 at the request of the local labor union United Food and Commercial Workers Local 400.

In the resolution, county officials pledged to support workers against an alleged ‘‘environment of intimidation, fear and violence” at the North Carolina pork processing facility that employs more than 5,000 people.

‘‘Your resolution made it sound like we were harming people, mistreating people and that is not the truth,” said Jim Patterson, a public relations manager for the meat company based out of Smithfield, Va. ‘‘We’d ask that you try to understand before you take action.”

Patterson said the UFCW union has used the council’s resolution to discredit Smithfield. UFCW officials could not be reached by press time.

The dispute centered around how the union is trying to enlist workers, Patterson said. While Smithfield wants a unionization vote to occur through secret ballot, UFCW wants to collect worker signatures through an open petition. Both sides claim the other’s method encourages worker intimidation.

The local manager for Smithfield’s processing plant in Landover also roasted the council.

FULL story at link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC