Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Employer violated NLRA (National Labor Relations Act) by prohibiting union e-mails on company system

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 07:44 PM
Original message
Employer violated NLRA (National Labor Relations Act) by prohibiting union e-mails on company system
Edited on Tue May-22-07 07:45 PM by Omaha Steve

No link yet.

Employer violated NLRA by prohibiting union e-mails on company system

The Fourth Circuit recently affirmed the National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) conclusion that an employer violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) by refusing to allow its employees to send company e-mails to disseminate union messages.

Facts

Media General Operations, Inc., had an official policy that restricted use of its e-mail system to matters related to company business.

According to its policy, "The e-mail system is provided to employees at Company expense to assist them in carrying out the Company's business." In practice, however, employees transmitted a wide variety of messages unrelated to company business, including personal messages, charitable announcements, and union matters.

The NLRB found that Media General did little to prevent employees' personal use of its e-mail system and disciplined only two workers for violations that involved pornography. Its general tolerance for e-mail violations began to change in May or June 1999, when Media General informed the union president that the union couldn't use the company e-mail system for communicating union messages. That was followed by a second verbal warning to the union president in September 1999.

The union's president didn't convey those warnings to other union leaders or the general membership. Apart from a reminder e-mailed to the union's president in June 2000, the company took no further action. The rest of the union's bargaining committee first learned of Media General's intent to enforce its e-mail policy during negotiations for a new collective bargaining agreement in July 2000. The company told union leaders to stop using its e-mail system for union business.

A short time later, the union complained to the NLRB that Media General had enforced its e-mail policy in a discriminatory way against the union. The NLRB concluded that Media General violated the NLRA because it hadn't enforced its business-only e-mail policy against nonunion e-mails, except for the pornography violations. The employer appealed that decision.

Fourth Circuit's analysis

The Fourth Circuit held that the NLRB's conclusion was reasonable. Although its policy restricted use of the e-mail system to company purposes, Media General made no attempt to enforce the rule for any violations other than union messages. The court emphasized that the evidence included numerous examples of messages unrelated to work. The e-mail system was frequently used by both hourly employees and managers to convey news about their personal lives, arrange social events, and inform coworkers about charities.

The court agreed with the NLRB that restricting the union's access to a communication channel while allowing others unfettered access to it is an unfair labor practice prohibited by the NLRA. Media General Operations Inc. d/b/a Richmond Times-Dispatch v. NLRB, Nos. 06-1023, 06-1061, and 06-1213 (4th Cir., March 15, 2007).

Bottom line

This case is a good reminder that written employment policies, which can be useful in avoiding liability, are ineffective if they aren't uniformly enforced. Evenhanded enforcement of all workplace rules is necessary to avoid potential discrimination complaints.


May 21, 2007

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. A Court decision - I knew the NRLB would never rule for the union. n/t
Edited on Tue May-22-07 08:52 PM by papau
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC