Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No tax on workers' health benefits

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-09-09 10:35 PM
Original message
No tax on workers' health benefits

http://www.detnews.com/article/20090709/OPINION03/907090341/No-tax-on-workers--health-benefits

Thursday, July 9, 2009
James P. Hoffa: WASHINGTON, D.C.

Detroit, we have a problem. We're suffering serious economic pain at a time when health care costs in our state are going through the roof. The one million Michiganians who don't have health insurance are one accident or one serious illness away from financial catastrophe.

It's well past time for that to change. Fortunately, Congress is finally beginning to grapple with a way to give all U.S. citizens access to affordable health insurance.

Unions support affordable health care for all, as do most Americans.

The problem is how to pay for it.

Max Baucus of Montana, the powerful chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, is suggesting an enormous new tax on employer-sponsored health insurance.

Many Americans, including those who have employer-provided coverage, believe a public, government-sponsored plan is a sensible way to make health insurance available to all -- including people who can't get it through their employer and who don't qualify for Medicaid or Medicare. But a tax hike on health benefits to pay for a public plan would be a poison pill for middle-class wage-earners to swallow.

Most Americans are deeply offended by the prospect of such a tax. A recent national survey by Lake Research Partners shows 80 percent of likely voters oppose taxing health benefits.

FULL story at link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-09-09 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. The way I understand this HC tax was that it would only be on
those whose benefits exceeded the avg, and the tax would only be on the amount over the average. ie: If the average cost of the HC benefit was $15,000 a year, and yours was $20,000, you would be taxed on $5,000. The actual ins costs I'm familiar with don't come close to being that high, and the tax would be on those higher paid individuals (usually executives) who actually get more than the average. I guess I'm trying to figure out just why so many DUers are against this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC