Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Picks Much-Needed Third Member for NLRB

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 07:56 PM
Original message
Obama Picks Much-Needed Third Member for NLRB

http://ohsonline.com/articles/2009/07/10/obama-picks-third-member-for-nlrb.aspx

If Brian Hayes is confirmed by the U.S. Senate, the five-member board will again have a quorum. The issue of whether hundreds of decisions issued by the two-member board are valid has been heated since the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on May 1 that one such order was invalid.

* Jul 10, 2009

President Obama on Thursday announced he intends to nominate Brian Hayes, currently Republican Labor Policy Director for the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, as a member of the National Labor Relations Board. If Hayes wins U.S. Senate confirmation, it would be a victory for the five-member NLRB, which decides unfair labor practice and union representation cases.

NLRB currently has only two members, Chairman Wilma B. Liebman and member Peter Carey Schaumber. Board members serve five-year terms, being nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate. Vacancies have been a persistent problem, one that became acute on May 1 when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a decision in Laurel Baye Healthcare of Lake Lanier Inc. v. NLRB, No. 08-1162. The case was a South Carolina health care company's appeal of an NLRB unfair labor practice ruling against it. Rather than allege any error in the ruling, the employer instead argued the NLRB order was invalid because the board had only two members. The D.C. Circuit panel agreed, and the NLRB soon filed a petition for rehearing by the full court.

The case has been followed closely in employment law circles because there has been a split among circuit courts of appeals that have ruled on the question, and also because as many as 400 NLRB decisions issued with just two members could be in jeopardy. The board claims it has the authority to decide cases with just two members. Coverage of the case is available here and here.

According to the White House news release, Hayes worked as a lawyer in private practice for more than 25 years, mainly representing management clients in labor and employment matters. He has represented employers before the NLRB, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and various state agencies and in arbitrations, mediations, and other forms of alternative dispute resolution. His experience includes clerking for the chief judge of the NLRB and serving as counsel to the chairman of the NLRB.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kalun D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. NLRB is a joke
""Brian Hayes, currently Republican Labor Policy Director for the U.S. Senate Committee on Health""

""Hayes worked as a lawyer in private practice for more than 25 years, mainly representing management clients in labor and employment matters""

and it looks like that's not going to change

I was involved with a Union effort a few years back. Whenever I would call the NLRB it took them 2 weeks to call back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC