Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

An EFCA majority sign-up “trigger”?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 06:03 PM
Original message
An EFCA majority sign-up “trigger”?

http://transitional.pww.org/article/view/16979/

Author: John Wojcik
People's Weekly World Newspaper, 09/11/09 07:03

PITTSBURGH – Some Blue Dog Democrats, fearful of a public option in a health care bill, have signaled that they might be willing to support a compromise measure that allows for creation of such an option once insurance companies show, under the president’s new plan, that they are continuing to charge customers too much. They are saying the “threat” of a public option might, by itself, force insurance companies to charge less.

While the mood here about the prospects for passage of labor’s other big legislative aim – the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) – is overwhelmingly positive, labor leaders and others assembling for the convention of the AFL-CIO that opens Sept. 13 are expecting a compromise on the majority sign-up provision. They are optimistic, however, that the compromise will preserve the intent of the so-called “card check” provision by giving workers, not employers, the choice of whether to form a union.

The latest compromise being circulated involves, similar to the health care compromise, a trigger mechanism – this time for majority sign-up.

Under the “trigger” compromise the time that can pass between the day that union supporters have a majority of the needed signatures and the day of an election, if the company insists on one, would be drastically shortened. The law would mandate an election in days, rather than months.
The penalties to an employer for even attempting to harass or influence employees would include cancellation of the election and “triggering” of automatic union certification as a result of the majority sign-up process that had taken place.

Other aspects of the compromise include, as do all of the deals that have been floated, measures to keep companies from stalling during contract talks and stiffer penalties for any violations of labor law.

“I’m cautiously optimistic that the 60 votes for this compromise, enough to avoid a filibuster, now exist in the Senate,” said Harold Meyerson, a progressive journalist, writer and columnist, who spoke with labor reporters here Sept. 10. Meyerson has met more than once with a number of the labor leaders and lawmakers involved in the talks on the EFCA.

Meyerson cautions, “Everybody agrees,” though, “that nothing will happen until the health care situation is resolved.”

FULL story at link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC