Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does Bush Admin. See Union Membership as Sign of Terrorism?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-30-07 07:16 PM
Original message
Does Bush Admin. See Union Membership as Sign of Terrorism?

http://blog.aflcio.org/2007/07/30/does-bush-admin-see-union-membership-as-sign-of-terrorism/

by Mike Hall, Jul 30, 2007





If a passenger flying from Europe to the United States is a member of a union, is gay or a Buddhist, will knowing that information help Homeland Security fight terrorism? The Bush administration thinks so. Starting in August, airlines flying from Europe to the United States will be required to provide sensitive personal passenger data about a person’s race, sexual orientation, health, religion and more if it’s in the airline reservation system.

The Washington Post reported last week that under a new agreement, approved by the European Union (EU) Parliament and signed by the United States, background information on travelers includes:

“racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, trade union membership” and data about an individual’s health, traveling partners and sexual orientation.

The information will be retained for 15 years by the Department of Homeland Security and can be shared with other government agencies and nations. Airlines do not routinely keep such information in their systems, and the Post reports the personal details could end up in a passenger’s file because of requests for special services or routine questioning by airlines or travel agents about emergency contacts, traveling companions, next of kin and lodging. The Post adds:

Even a request for a king-size bed at a hotel could be noted in the database.

The agreement, which expands on a previous program, has privacy and civil libertarians on both sides of the Atlantic alarmed. When European officials balked at the breadth of the program earlier this summer, the Post reported the Bush administration threatened to turn back flights from Europe if the deal was not approved.

FULL story at link.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-30-07 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Mike Hall. Cool.
:toast: MKJ

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-30-07 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hell, I can't afford to fly anywhere anyway
I'm a former member of Bricklayers and Trowel Trades Local # 1, Tucson, Az.
The union has virtually no power here in Sierra Vista, 80 miles south of Tucson. In fact, I believe there is a direct correlation between union membership and proximity to the Mexican border.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-30-07 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Who was the Bush cabinet member that called the NEA a terrorist org.?
oh, yeah, Rod Paige, sec. of education. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-30-07 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. Article... and yes, many labor organizers in the southern hemisphere
have met with untimely deaths dealt by those who consider them to be a terrorist threat.


http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Bush_Gang/Manufacturing_Fear.html

According to Noam Chomsky, in Nicaragua alone, the US killed in excess of two million defenseless people with the aid of CIA sponsored death squads; a total that exceeds the per capita sum of American soldiers killed in all the wars America has ever fought. Their purpose was to suppress progressive movements in the Southern Hemisphere, to assassinate labor organizers, and indigenous leaders; to prevent the rise to power of leaders who favor people above profits. The US has a long and bloody history of suppressing populist movements wherever they occur. Perhaps they bear too much resemblance to Democracy-so they have to be destroyed. Reagan and his minions labeled them communist threats because that is what sells among the gullible American people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-30-07 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. Correct answer is YES...
anything other than full obeisance is in fact a threat and a crime.I know that you know this, but your readers must understand that to the current powers, any objection to ongoing exploitation must be crushed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC