PART 3 Randi Rhodes Lets go to work

[cooolandrew]

Run time: 05:01 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ato1UFcPRB4   Posted on YouTube: March 10, 2008 By YouTube Member: Views on YouTube: 0   Posted on DU: March 10, 2008 By DU Member: cooolandrew Views on DU: 1527

 
PART 1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Moj_fYp6xMc


PART 2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3qOi_l1RGY

[cooolandrew]

1. Email to as many as possible. Especially in PA.

[Mithreal]

2. I like RR but I don't always agree with her

Other than some quotations taken away from context, what evidence is there that Hillary would rather McCain win? I suspect zero evidence exists. FWIW I am an Obama supporter and believe that these kinda accusations without evidence are destructive to the party. I am open to facts though, so where is the proof?

I suspect we are all being played by corporate media and even RR is susceptible to the unfounded accusations that are flying. I am susceptible as well, but am trying to be more skeptical of anything that comes from corporate media. I realize RR is not corporate media.

Thanks to McCamy's journal I realize a lot of lies against HRC are debunkable and traceable to people who deserve our contempt.

I repeat I am an Obama supporter to avoid silly accusations about my slanted bias.

[cooolandrew]

3. One thing that gives it creedance is that she knwos HRC and was on her show one time.

[Mithreal]

4. That is a very weak argument unfortunately

I am an Obama supporter so if it looks weak to me, imagine how weak it must look to an HRC supporter.

I listened to the most of the RR show when it came on AM1090 here is Seattle area and thought it was outlandish then since no solid evidence was offered.

If you accept unsubstantiated accusations because they were about HRC you probably already supported Obama, right? All HRC supporters can easily disregard these negative attacks because they would ignore any attack of their candidate but especially weak ones. Any undecideds who eat this up without evidence are likely to swallow the next baseless attack from either side just as well, right? How about just the idea of putting weak weapons in the hands of your supporters???

Do we really want to be a part of dumbing down this election or treating the voters with contempt? Unsubstantiated rumors encourage that dumbing down. What about blowback if or when voters find out the unsubstantiated rumor was false? What if you offend voters by promoting what seem like lies and that voter can smell the BS?

Again, I am friendly to Obama, so please if you are going to push this idea, demand evidence. There are substantive reasons to pick one candidate over the other, so this sort of thing is silly or worse if untrue.

Extraordinary claims deserve extraordinary evidence, don't they? How about any evidence, not just a few out of context quotes?

[FlaGranny]

5. You are obviously not familiar with her web site.

She posts links there to everything she says on her show. You can find out anything you want to know there about politics. If she has no proof or links, she either says nothing or says she "has a feeling" or "wonders" about something. I've found over that years that if she comes out and says it, you can take it to the bank. Just ask the few who've taken her to court - and lost, because she spoke truth. She's very wise about such things.

[ACanadianLiberal]

10. So, keep your face straight

Since RR spoke truth, do you still believe HRC was behind the Obama's NAFTAGate scandal even the Canada government denounced such a thing officially?

[FlaGranny]

11. Only one thing to say:

read this: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/sns-ap-democrats-nafta,0,7024247.story

Behind it? No. Distorting it and taking advantage? Yes.

[ACanadianLiberal]

12. Got it, The real problem here is you have a problem with

Hillary taking advantage over this Obama's NAFTAGate scandal. This is exactly what I meant you are just bunch of "baby-killers" who are fiercely mad at the cry from the baby on the slaughter bed.

How sick you are! You are pursueing a dark future. Hopeless!

[bjobotts]

14. Need another studio just to hold RR's ego. She's doing what the MSM has

been doing for the last 15yrs....digging up every biased slanted opinionated thing she can to destroy Clinton with. She's less an Obama supporter than she is a Clinton destroyer. Hell, you can't even listen to her show anymore she's so filled with self righteous condemnation and Hillary contempt it's pathetic. the woman is so filled with anger and rage and takes credit for everything others have done while shouting down any dissent. If I thought for one moment that Obama condoned her contemptuous behavior I wouldn't vote for him. In fact Obama stands against all the tactics RR uses on a daily basis. I don't like or appreciate Rush Limbaugh or a left leaning Mrs. Rush Limbaugh either. No one can tell RR anything because if you don't agree with her then your stupid. At best she's been tolerable on Air America but now she's just a vicious Hillary attack dog. Because of Thomm Hartmann Air America at least provides a voice for progressives but LLionel and Rhandi are just irritants to the movement and the cause. Mocking the very people they would have listen to them.

[elixir]

6. It's very disappointing to hear Randi making this case w/ so little consideration to the facts.

Fact: Way before Hillary compared her and John McCain's experience with that of Barack Obama, Obama was comparing Hillary's voting record to that of the republicans.

I love Randi but she tends be windbag on issues.

[clevbot]

7. big picture?

I think people are just pissed that Hillary won't drop out. How can Hillary talk about the disenfranchisement of voters in MI/Fl when on the other hand, wants to win the nomination through SD's. Personally I have no problem with the SD's because those are the rules of the Democratic Party. But the sheeple will be spun to think they are being disenfranchised as the SD's take away their nominee. For the good of the Party, Hillary should drop out. We should be working on not letting McBush into the White House

[ACanadianLiberal]

8. who are you? coolardrew

In the part 2, you responded me saying: "Randi was backing it up with Olberman Canda has debunked it", but you still keep spreading the nonsenses around, especially urging people to email those debunked messages to their friends.

You appears very close to RR, and you know what she is doing. You know what she is doing is wrong, but you are still using RR as a tool to achieve something.

YOU ARE A TROLL.

[psychmommy]

9. i love randi

i have to go to her website and hear the rest. don't be discouraged by those who can't handle the truth. keep on putting the info out there. i loved when she said that they knew there were no wmd's because of the uncsom inspections during bill's presidency. keep up the good work, truth hurts sometime.

[bjobotts]

13. God what an idiot...but for the left at least. Children aren't the future because

when the future gets here they will be adults like us. Obama isn't bringing the youth vote out, they would be coming out anyway out of desperation to stop the destruction of our democracy by this Bush disaster. The young voters would be there whether Obama was there or not. They were coming out around here before Obama even announced he was running. Obama just got out in front of that parade and is now taking credit for it because young people are supporting him. But if he wasn't there those same young people would be supporting someone else promising to change the direction of this country.

It's like saying the circus came to town because there was a clown here when it was coming here anyway no matter which clown hooks his ladder to it.