It wasn't her intended meaning was that Obama is winning because blacks are voting for him. Here's what she said:
When the subject turned to Obama, Clinton's rival for the Democratic Party nomination, Ferraro's comments took on a decidedly bitter edge.
"I think what America feels about a woman becoming president takes a very secondary place to Obama's campaign - to a kind of campaign that it would be hard for anyone to run against," she said. "For one thing, you have the press, which has been uniquely hard on her. It's been a very sexist media. Some just don't like her. The others have gotten caught up in the Obama campaign.
"If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position," she continued. "And if he was a woman (of any color) he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept." Ferraro does not buy the notion of Obama as the great reconciler.
She's dismissing the idea that Obama has any merit as a candidate... that his success is only due to the 'luck' of his race. That's pretty offensive, in my book. Whichever candidate you support, you have to acknowledge that Barack Obama is an individual of extraordinary political skill and competence. I don't have any doubt that any individual with his abilities would be giving Hillary a run for her money, whether he was a white man or an Asian woman. Ferraro demeaned herself and Hillary's campaign by refusing to acknowledge this. It's insulting, the same way it would be if an employee said that a coworker who objectively performed better on the job was only promoted "because he's a black guy".
What is making it worse is that Ferraro is digging in her heels, and Hillary is looking the other way. Again, if an employee went around the office saying that someone who had been promoted for doing an objectively better job only got the position "because he's a black guy", you'd call him on the carpet for it. If he insisted on spreading that message, you'd fire him. You wouldn't say, "We disagree with you," and let him go on doing it unless that was the message you intended to send.
Like I said, I don't think there's been a serious racial controversy so far. But this is becoming one. We'll see how it develops. But if Hillary supporters try to deny the ugliness of Ferraro's message, they're just going to underscore it. I just hope Hillary gets that message before she does any more damage.
On update: I just read the quote I think you were referring to earlier where Ferraro says, "In all honesty, do you think that if he were a white male, there would be a reason for the black community to get excited for a historic first?"
Well, would there be any reason for 72% of whites to vote against him, as they did in Mississippi tonight? Was his race a boon to him in white, rural Iowa? That's really what's so insulting here -- the way she minimizes Obama as a person, as a talent and an intellect, and tries to tie the success of his campaign solely to his being a black man. If blacks vote for him, well, they're just voting for their own; if whites vote for him, they're "caught up in a concept". He can't win under those terms. No one can. That's what makes the attack so ugly and revolting to me.
I don't think Ferraro realizes how far this country has come since 1984, when she was picked for VP on the basis of her gender, and Jesse Jackson's run was largely seen as a novelty. We don't live in 1984 anymore. Times have changed. This is not some circus sideshow, and she'd better learn to deal with people as people, and not just as genders or ethnicities if she wants to say anything relevant anymore.