Perry Logan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 07:53 AM
Original message |
What the Hell is Conservatism? |
|
Don't ask a conservative. They'd be the last to know.
|
pedo
(362 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 09:32 AM
Response to Original message |
1. my god that was too annoying to watch |
|
the effects were completely unnecessary and cheesy, and even a little insulting. i couldn't watch more than the first 20 seconds
|
Phred42
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 09:58 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Agree - I didn't last 15 sec |
|
Make your point without the crappy trapings
|
Ztarbod
(82 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 11:48 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Too annoying and some what pointless |
|
"What is conservatism?" and What is Liberalism? are questions that are easily answered with a dictionary. Unfortunately, very few people who call themselves liberal or conservative seem to agree with those definitions, leading to a great deal of 'confusion'.
|
politicaholic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-30-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message |
4. The sixties were hard on Perry...he never got past Laugh In sytle humor... |
|
comedy doesn't work like lies. Tell a joke over and over again and it doesn't all of a sudden become funny, especially when it wasn't funny in the first place.
It's much easier to get your point across when people don't abandon the video before the point is made. I think this is a case of unorganic video production masking a hollow and simple message.
|
Perry Logan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-01-08 05:40 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Don't be afraid. See the whole enchilada on Google Video. |
|
Edited on Tue Apr-01-08 05:43 AM by Perry Logan
Here's all of "What the Hell Is Conservatism?" on Google Video. Brain-damage problem almost entirely solved: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6978008798627886162&hl=en
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:23 AM
Response to Original message |