OURcountry - YouTube vs. Michelle Malkin

[4bucksagallon]

Run time: 00:42 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mb6v2MShL2c   Posted on YouTube: October 16, 2006 By YouTube Member: OurCountry Views on YouTube: 26913   Posted on DU: November 01, 2006 By DU Member: 4bucksagallon Views on DU: 1712

 
Short only 42 seconds. There is hope yet for the country.

[Teaser]

what?

Run time: 00:42 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mb6v2MShL2c   Posted on YouTube: October 16, 2006 By YouTube Member: OurCountry Views on YouTube: 26913   Posted on DU: November 01, 2006 By DU Member: Teaser Views on DU: 1712

 
nt

[xultar]

1. Dare I say PHUCK YEAH!!!! They ban us we ban them. Payback is a beotch.

[bluestateguy]

2. Live by the rules, die by the rules

YouTube is a private company and they can allow or disallow whoever they wish to post on their website. Aren't those the very free market principles conservatives have believed in for years?

[The Count]

3. Oh, no! Poor wittle wepublicans! Opressed minority? Oh, the humanity!

No one is banned from you tube. But sometimes, the viewers themselves are objecting to content...You know, when it's hateful and false and subhuman...

[underpants]

7. Culture of victimization

The support the troops line is actually funny.

Honey if the fundies had their way readheads would be burned as witches. You need to learn a little more before you open your mouth otherwise you end up looking like an idiot or a republican.

[rockymountaindem]

4. Yes! Because the only people who support the troops

are conservatives! They'll just keep beating that dead horse over and over.

[wryter2000]

5. I notice she's on there

Who's denying her free speech?

The real question is can Loretta Sanchez get on a plane?

[brainshrub]

6. What did she get banned for?

Just curious.

[4bucksagallon]

11. I don't think she really got banned but you know how repressed these

poor conservatives feel. haha I go around flagging all right wing posts as inappropriate, just for fun.

[brainshrub]

18. But specificaly, what kinds of examples do they have?

My own political stuff I post on YouTube gets flaged by cons, so that's nothing new. Did Malkin give out phone numbers of political opponents again?

[Rose Siding]

8. God, they're all so persecuted. If only the majority would......um, no wait.

*scratching head*

[bluerum]

9. Hey doll. Live by the ban, die by the ban. Get over it already. nt

[robinlynne]

10. I love youtube.

[Redstone]

12. What a shame to see such a babelicious young woman with such

a defective brain.

Redstone

[Hand]

15. Meh.

She looks like a slightly younger Ann Coulter with no Adam's apple, IMHO. :puke: Pity about the brain in any case, though

[cool user name]

29. I didn't know if it was satire or if it was real ...

She was hot ...

but, now that I understand that she actually meant what she said, then I'll also put her in the "floozy" categorey.

What a waste.

[Old and In the Way]

30. She's auditioning for a talking head spot on Faux Snooze.

Gotta build her credibility....being a pro-Dimson/WATB and good looking will help her with the demographic that they want to target: stupid, young white males.

[Buzz Clik]

13. How do you spell "shrill"?

That woman was over the top. I guess she's trying out for Coulter's job of skinny, angry, rightwing, white chick who doesn't get it.

Assuming that she's correct about the banning of anyone from YouTube, she doesn't seem to understand how this country functions: YouTube decides who posts on their site because they own the site.

[4bucksagallon]

14. Let me set the record straight I don't think she was really banned.

There are a lot of paradies on you tube. But one can dream.

[Skinner]

20. Then you might want to change your thread title.

Because many people seem to be falling for it.

[4bucksagallon]

21. Yeah, I guess I better edit it,

[Skinner]

16. This isn't true.

C'mon folks. Think. This isn't true.

It's deliberately misleading play on the term "red flagged". I'm guessing that some anonymous liberal -- or even a shit-stirring anonymous republican -- hit the "Flag as inappropriate" button.

And, at the risk of sounding like a hypocrite myself, I am glad this is not true. YouTube should not be in the business of censoring people for their political views.

[Skinner]

19. Here are search results for the word "Malkin." See? She's still there.

C'mon, everyone. Don't be so gullible.

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_type=search_videos&search_query=malkin&search_sort=video_date_uploaded&search_category=0

[bluerum]

23. Wishful thinking - waiting for aggressive action from any media.

Banning loudmouth disruptive "distortionating" political operatives seems to me to be an exercise in editorial policy.

[Buzz Clik]

24. errrr... Michelle Malkin plays hockey?

[NVMojo]

17. who is that herniated young lady? HAHA!!! Backlash predicted on Youtube

Rush and other fat fuckers of his ilk will start a right wing one.

[zbdent]

22. and suddenly, the average collective IQ of youtube goes way up

[booley]

25. Wow, is it just me..

..OR does IRONY seem like a foriegn concept to cons?

[slowry]

26. If any of her videos were ever removed...

... it was probably because she is flat out racist.

[Cocoa]

27. that woman's voice sounds just like Malkin herself

weird.

[cool user name]

28. I didn't quite get the message ...

????

[drm604]

31. But yet somehow this video is still on YouTube.

I think this is simply more false outrage about false issues.

[drm604]

32. Have any of you checked out the website?

The video mentions a website, http://ourcountry.com. Check it out, especially the racist cartoon. It looks like a lame attempt to make a fun, hip website that happens to include right-wing humor. Propoganda aimed at young people, by someone without a clue. But here's what's interesting - the whois for that domain shows the following:

Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: OURCOUNTRY.COM
Created on: 27-Jan-99
Expires on: 27-Jan-08
Last Updated on:

Administrative Contact:
troxler:, lee lee AT leetroxler DOT com
lee troxler
825 Las Palmas
Santa Barbara, California 93110
United States
1 805 687 3626

One of the people involved in "Fahrenhype 9/11", an attack on Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11, was named Lee Troxler. Could it be the same person? Check out the whois info for the domain fahrenhype911.com:

Registrant:
Michael & Me L.P.
147 West Election Road
Draper, Utah 84020
United States

Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: FAHRENHYPE911.COM
Created on: 18-Aug-04
Expires on: 18-Aug-07
Last Updated on: 19-Jul-05

Administrative Contact:
Avacuum, Abhors [e-mail]
Michael & Me L.P.
147 West Election Road
Draper, Utah 84020
United States
805-687-3626

Different name and address but - same phone number! By the way, that number just happens to belong to http://www.leetroxler.com.

Even with electoral defeat staring them in the face, they just don't give up on trying this shit. Since LeeTroxler.com is a direct marketing company, I wonder who's paying them to create and run ourcountry.com? My guess is that, if we could somehow trace the money, it would most likely lead to some K Street firm.

[drm604]

33. More info.

This page, http://www.leetroxler.com/who.htm, has a list of some of Lee Troxler's clients and campaigns. The list includes "FahrenHYPE 9/11", " Republican National Committee", "President Ronald Reagan", and "President George Bush". It doesn't say which President George Bush.

[4bucksagallon]

34. Interesting info.