Hillary Clinton on COUNTDOWN with Keith Olbermann pt.1

[Amerigo Vespucci]

Run time: 09:40 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIR9BV4boxE   Posted on YouTube: April 22, 2008 By YouTube Member: Views on YouTube: 0   Posted on DU: April 22, 2008 By DU Member: Amerigo Vespucci Views on DU: 1276

 

[BleedingHeartPatriot]

1. K and R. Thanks for posting.

:kick:

[bhikkhu]

2. Thanks. The first reply focussing on energy is completely clueless.

That is, lacking any sense of the problem as it is, and lacking any suggestion of a real solution. The same watered down rhetoric with nothing behind it we hear continually, for years, in DC, while nothing gets done. Not impressed.

[jackson_dem]

3. Thanks for posting

[HowHasItComeToThis]

4. WHAT A DISGUSTING PERFORMANCE

[anamandujano]

6. There weren't enough umms, ahhhs and errrrrrrrrrrrs.

[Cant trust em]

10. as an Obama supporter I must say that he is weak there

but on the other hand we have Clinton who seems like she's reading off of cue cards. She has an excellent memory.

[anamandujano]

5. Good job.

[candice]

7. Thanks for posting. It is good to know that there is an option to the media sell...

Axelrod's campaign is wearing thin...he should have revamped it after Patrick Deval. The creative leap from "Together we can!" to "Yes, we can!" wasn't huge. Change can be whatever you want it to be. Deval's "change" might be simply to bring a few casinos to Mass. He lacked the experience to do the job as governor, but had the slick Axelrod ad campaign to sell him to voters based on slogans. The disconnect between the hope and the reality brings swooning voters down to earth.

Mass. went for Hillary in spite of Teddy and Kerry because they had already been burned by the campaign of falling back on "your own aspirations," "hope," "change," NEW IMPROVED NO MONEY DOWN.

[Ztarbod]

8. If Hillary won't talk to Iran, nuking them is reasonable

[Cant trust em]

9. No mention of diplomacy with Iran

Just saber-rattling.

[aquart]

14. Yeah, that's how professionals begin the process.

Did nobody here ever take International Relations 101?

[Emillereid]

11. "provoke a nuclear response" - anyone willing to use nuclear weapons is crazy!

Why does she conveniently forget that our agreement in the anti-proliferation treaty was to disarm and dismantle our nuclear arsenal - if we can violate the terms of the treaty why can't the non-nuclear countries also do so. The non-proliferation treaty did not set us up to nuclear police of the world deciding who can have nuclear weapons (Israel, India, Pakistan) and who can't (Iran). What a crazy, insane world we live in. To think if this woman should be president, instead of bringing a woman's sensibility to the job, she would out macho them all!

[Cieran]

12. The political "whore"

once again proves she doesn't read the NIE's before opening her neocon mouth. Too bad Keith didn't call her on it.

Also, she claims Iran would be the only nuclear power in the Middle East. Again, Keith doesn't call her on this lie. Israel has had massive nuclear arsenals for at least 20 years, and refuses to sign the NNPT (which, ironically, Iran HAS signed), which is the CAUSE of the arms race in the past. Israel has attacked every country that neighbors it in wars of aggression and conquest. Since no country has been able to achieve effective conventional weapon deterrents to keep Israeli apartheid aggression in check, of course the most prized goal would be nuclear weapons. It's the only thing that can stop the Zionists.

But unfortunately for Hillary and the neocons, the NIE directly contradicts the claims that Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons, they are merely seeking nuclear energy which is allowed under the NNPT that the United States and Iran are both signatories to.

[aquart]

13. Massive nuclear arsenals????

In a nation smaller than New Jersey? Where are they? Under the tomatoes? Or the oranges?

Ye gods, the irrational idiocy accepted as fact on these boards.

[Cieran]

15. Israel's Nukes

Israeli nukes were created at the Dimona reactor initially.

Presently, Israel has at least ONE nuclear device at the Israeli Embassy in NEW YORK CITY. Israel has nuclear weapon(s) deployed in AMERICA. This isn't a crazy conspiracy theory. The Department of Energy and the GAO released their radiological survey of NYC in 2005. You can read about it here:
http://www.nogw.com/download/_07_il_nyc_embassy_hot_spot.pdf

"One alleged radiation hot spot on Manhattan's east side has the potential for becoming a political hot spot: A strong radiation spike from the area of the Israeli Embassy. Officials would not comment on why they thought that particular area allegedly showed such a stunning peak in radiation. "

I like how they have to throw the word "alleged" and "allegedly" in there twice, despite the fact that they were looking at SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE of the radiation spike. And yet they then say that the "alleged" scientific evidence is not just there, but at levels that are STUNNING.

Just google "radiation Israeli embassy nyc".

[SKKY]

16. She sounds just like Bush...

...She's more Hawkish than Bush is, that's for sure.