(2:07)Difference between W and McCain? SC Gov. blanks out-freezes

[underpants]

Run time: 02:07 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qtL4l_Rsls0   Posted on YouTube: July 13, 2008 By YouTube Member: Views on YouTube: 0   Posted on DU: July 14, 2008 By DU Member: underpants Views on DU: 956

 
BLITZER: Are there any significant economic differences between what the Bush administration has put forward, over these many years, as opposed to, now, what John McCain supports?

SANFORD: Yes. I mean, for instance, take, you know -- take, for instance, the issue of -- I'm drawing a blank, and I hate it when I do that, particularly on television.

SANFORD: But take, for instance, the contrast on NAFTA. I mean, I think that the bigger issue is credibility in where one is coming from on, are they consistent where they come from.

John McCain has consistently stood against earmarks throughout his tenure in the United States Senate. Regrettably, the president has not been exactly busy with the veto pen on earmarks. I mean, there's just one contrast alone. It's particularly relevant...

BLITZER: Let me get back to -- you raised the issue of NAFTA. I don't see -- he's a huge supporter of free trade, John McCain. The Bush administration supports free trade. I don't see a big difference between the two of them on NAFTA.

SANFORD: No, I was going to go to a point -- I was going to go to a point which is, what you would want is consistency with regard to that position.

What I think is more relevant is Obama had said during the primary process we've got to go ahead and redraw NAFTA, and now his comments have been much more tepid post-primary about well, maybe...

BLITZER: That's a major difference between Obama and the president, but as far as NAFTA is concerned, McCain and Bush are on the same page.

SANFORD: They are, for free trade.
http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Action=UserDisplayFullDocument&orgId=574&topicId=100007219&docId=l:821129787&start=5

[smoogatz]

1. Holy crap. SNL couldn't have done it any better.

Fucking hilarious.

[Gato Moteado]

2. beautiful

nt

[Indenturedebtor]

3. Bwahahahaha "Um er um uh hrmmm. Obama bad McBush good!!!!11"

Priceless! :rofl:

[proud patriot]

4. isn't sanford a possible vp choice for mcsame as bush?

[underpants]

6. Yes-see link- later in the transcript Wolf asks about this

Sanford oww gee shucks ME!!?!?!'s it up

[AlbertCat]

5. Dance! Dance! Dance!

[Jack Rabbit]

7. That makes a pretty good Obama spot

Sanford is asked about the difference and he stammers for 30 seconds. Run it!

[Hutzpa]

8. Priceless....

[SaveOurSovereignty]

9. What a schmuck

Love getting to watch this neo con cheer leader squirm
This and Jesse Ventura announcing he will be running for the senate has made my day :p

[Sam Ervin jret]

10. There is a very BIG difference on the economy between Bush and McShame!

McShame is going to bring in Dr. Phil "for an economic group hug experience" so all you whiners will feel better and go out and shop.

McShame feels your "totally in your mind and not having anything to do with real economics" pain.

Bush never thought of that, did he? Well in fairness to Bush he may have thought of it if economics "brainstorming hour" at the white house wasn't scheduled at the same time as reruns of "24." The man has to set priorities.

[Plucketeer]

11. I always thought

They'd brief guests on what points would be covered in the spot. I guess Sanford didn't get such treatment! :dunce: