Richardson nails McSame on FauxNews: "I don't know why he's whining about this."

[jefferson_dem]

Run time: 04:54 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FDktWIGEi8   Posted on YouTube: July 22, 2008 By YouTube Member: Views on YouTube: 0   Posted on DU: July 22, 2008 By DU Member: jefferson_dem Views on DU: 2059

 

[kevinbgoode]

1. Who is this unprofessional woman. . .and why didn't the journalism

school she likely never attended rescind her degree?

[jefferson_dem]

4. That is standard faire for FauxNews. This woman is an anchor!

All partisanship aside, this little clip serves as a model for how fucked up the so-called news network really is.

[1Hippiechick]

17. Well, they've dropped HER anchor one too many times. She's also cross-eyed. (Apologies to my cross

-eyed friends.)

[mmm413]

16. You assume she went to journalism school.

Journalists don't dress like she does. FAUX "News" doesn't hire journalists.

[1Hippiechick]

18. Oh, you know how the Repukes omit important words: She went to FAUX journalism school . n/t

[WV_Biker]

21. She's gotta great ....

....face for radio.

[DS1]

2. He let that fucking ***** slide with too much

Slipping in so much bullshit. Wanted to strangle her.

[kevinbgoode]

3. Apparently Republicans are so used to the op-ed pages reading

like a campaign advertisement for the GOP, that they can't fathom the idea that anything should be edited or make a point. Clearly the McSame campaign assumed this was an offer for free advertising.

[kevinbgoode]

5. "This recent poll"...notice how the unprofessional propagandist

doesn't cite the poll - or the source. I know why I don't watch Faux "News". . .but their level of shilling for bulls*it is unpatriotic and unAmerican. They don't believe the American people should ever be allowed to think for themselves. Clearly the hack doing the interview is incapable of reporting "news" with any kind of ethics.

[Labors of Hercules]

22. It is unethical.

completely biased "reporting" shouldn't be allowed on any network. There has to be some standard of objectivity, and there is NONE. She even had the HYPOCRISY to mention the fairness doctrine (of course she doesn't know what the right fucking name for it is), as if she and her entire bullshit network aren't the most unfair, jaded liars of all of them!

I believe in free speech, but what qualifies as "news" has to be regulated. Journalists have a responsibility to the American people to keep the news as objective as possible, and maintain separate sources for those seeking editorial bias.

[EnviroBat]

6. This cross-eyed bimbo should shove it.

All of Fux Noise is nothing more than a RW propaganda machine, and I'm sick of their shit. I love their made up Fox statistics which they use to support their steady stream of bullshit.

[Renew Deal]

7. Why does she think that Obama will change his mind about Iraq after getting back?

It looks like that's their next talking point. Obviously, watching Fox talk about fairness is laughable.

[jefferson_dem]

9. I have no fucking clue what she is talking about and neither does she.

The only ones changing their minds since Barack started his tour is McSame and Chimpy.

[Renew Deal]

10. She's just reading the talking point.

But the pukes must have some idea that Obama is going to go to Iraq and come back thinking it was a great idea.

[Bette Noir]

8. That bim makes me want to choke her.

The NYT asked for a re-write to clarify his terms. How come Fox never got incensed when a publisher has rejected one of my pieces? I know I'm a better writer than McCain, and probably have a better grasp of foreign policy. At least I don't think Iraq and Pakistan share a border.

[Jack Rabbit]

11. I lost track of how often her assertions were not supported by facts

Oh, well. It is Fox "News", after all,

[callous taoboy]

12. I quit watching network news in 2002 or so,

and this is literally maybe the 4th time in my life I've ever watched anything from Faux News. What a shrill, biased piece of work that anchor is.

[IndependentDem]

13. i couldn't finish watching this shit.

:argh: :puke:

[SKKY]

14. They don't even try to be fair and balanced anymore...

...at least before they used to "try". Now it's just hack, hack, hack away.

[1Hippiechick]

19. Omitted: "un" as in unfair and unbalanced....typical Repukes - omit selectively...n/t

[ayeshahaqqiqa]

15. That cretin who was supposedly questioning Richardson

made me want to vomit. She was obviously biased, and was nasty about it, too. I haven't watched TV news in years--and never watched Faux unless it was forced on me (like in a waiting room). My opinion of it hasn't changed--if it were a newspaper, I wouldn't even use it for fish wrap.

[1Hippiechick]

20. Which do you despise more: her or Michelle whats-her-name? (Please say Michelle) LOL

[ayeshahaqqiqa]

24. Malkin?

Malkin, of course.

[aaronbees]

23. Obama change his policy after his trip?

Sounds like he's getting support for it. Who's this wretched anchor? Awwww, McCain is not the "press darling" anymore. Boo fucking hoo, Faux News brat. Richardson was entirely too patient with her; I couldn't bring myself to do that if I were in his shoes.

[Mugsy]

25. She just said, "McCain used to be the media darling"...

...so she'd b!+ching that the Media seems to to be showing Obama "favoritism" while acknowledging that they previously showed McCain favoritism???

Then in the middle, she says the Times would only print McCain's rebuttal only "if it's not too hard on Senator Obama, no doubt." WTF?

"When you have one candidate on a show, you're supposed to have the other candidate on". Is she calling for the return on The Fairness Doctrine???

And that last swipe: "It'll be interesting to see ... after Obama returns and changes his position on Iraq"??? WTF was that?

That entire interview was just shamelessly pro-McCain.

[Mugsy]

26. One thing this video makes clear...

...the Right wing is ALREADY laying the foundation for the next four years, so they can claim Obama's victory will be due entirely to "unfair favoritism" shown him by the press.