Mark E. Smith
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-24-08 07:18 PM
Original message |
Sarah Palin on John McCain's deregulation record |
|
Run time: 00:12
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xpb7z_PjbAs
Posted on YouTube: September 24, 2008
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
Posted on DU: September 25, 2008
By DU Member: Mark E. Smith
Views on DU: 1077 |
|
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-24-08 07:20 PM
Response to Original message |
1. ZOMG!!!! That's even more priceless than reading the transcript!!!!! |
|
THANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOU!!!!!
She really thinks it's all a joke - it's so funny!
|
Mark E. Smith
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-24-08 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. It's like she's discussing children's clothing or something |
|
The woman is a complete blank. There is nothing there!
|
tishaLA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-24-08 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
12. It really is. It's like a kid caught lying or something. |
SuckItTrebeck
(44 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-24-08 07:20 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Katie looks like she'd like to bring something to Sarah's face when they cut back to her at the anchor desk.
|
livelongandprosper
(417 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-24-08 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. Aha, so that's what she said. |
|
Bring 'em to ya.
What a boor. Just like Bush.
|
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-24-08 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
I can't get that out of my head!!!!!
:rofl:
|
tekisui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-24-08 07:21 PM
Response to Original message |
4. During her interview with Charlie, he neck got red with rash |
|
when she messed up. They went with a high collar for katie.
|
Mojambo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-24-08 07:24 PM
Response to Original message |
6. The look on Couric's face at the beginning of this clip is HILARIOUS. |
raystorm7
(944 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-24-08 07:24 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Holy Shark Feathers! Qualified to be PoTUS? Qualified?!!!!!! |
LostInAnomie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-24-08 07:33 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Jeebus! That is one dumb lady. |
|
It should be obvious to anyone watching this ant the "Charlie" interview that any question that requires her to say something more that a pre-scripted answer, a sweeping generality, or "maverick" is beyond her abilities.
She is worthless.
|
mzmolly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-24-08 07:34 PM
Response to Original message |
|
At least they didn't edit the entire interview like they did for McCain, huh?
|
tinrobot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-24-08 07:36 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Try and find them... just try... |
Cali_Democrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-24-08 07:44 PM
Response to Original message |
paparush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-24-08 07:49 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Heckuva job Palin...brrrring em to ya! |
|
All the while..inside her Jesus-hugging brain "Katie Couric you fScking c#nt..how dare you make me look bad. If I had my trusty 30-06 I'd blow a #10 size hole through your guts..."
|
taddles
(92 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-24-08 07:55 PM
Response to Original message |
15. Useless, utterly fucking useless! |
|
I have two dogs who are more qualified to be VP. Take your pick, the dumb one licks herself all day and the smart one knows not to shit on the carpet...either one is a dramatic step up from Palin.
|
ksimons
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-24-08 09:13 PM
Response to Original message |
16. flowing from that mouth? pure garbage |
|
garbage.. okay, I said it again
the fact that she is on one of 2 parties heading for the White House PROVES the Republicans are not only incompetent, but that they culpable in the demise of our country's status in the world.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:48 PM
Response to Original message |