Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chambliss' Bizarre Reaction To Whistleblower In Aftermath Of Imperial Sugar Fire Tragedy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:14 AM
Original message
Chambliss' Bizarre Reaction To Whistleblower In Aftermath Of Imperial Sugar Fire Tragedy
 
Run time: 03:47
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OHF-ZaodkQ
 
Posted on YouTube: November 17, 2008
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: November 17, 2008
By DU Member: Wetzelbill
Views on DU: 2991
 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
loveable liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 03:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. Saxby is an tool.
I cant believe that such a tool would run for re-election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannie4peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. also an asshole!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 04:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. When was this?
Edited on Mon Nov-17-08 04:29 AM by Kire
What was the background...

When was the Imperial Sugar Fire Tragedy?

Who is this remarkable witness?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Here is some basic background
His name is Graham H. Graham, the VP of Operations for the company. This was from this past July.

2008 Georgia sugar refinery explosion
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Georgia_sugar_refinery_explosion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I found this article: Chambliss subpoenaed in Imperial Sugar case
I know it won't happen but I wish Chambliss would wind up sharing a cell with Stevens. :)

http://www.savannahnow.com/node/601053

U.S. Sen. Saxby Chambliss has been ordered to provide evidence in lawsuits stemming from the Feb. 7 Imperial Sugar Co. explosion and fire.

The Republican lawmaker was subpoenaed Wednesday on behalf of four victims - two dead and two injured - of the Port Wentworth inferno that killed 14 and hurt scores of others.

The action surfaced less than two weeks before the Nov. 4 election, which pits Chambliss in a tight race against Democrat Jim Martin.

Savannah attorney Mark Tate says Chambliss might be part of an Imperial "effort to shift responsibility" away from the company.


His ilk make me want to :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Senator Saxby Chambliss is scapegoating the witness
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesmail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. That's how it seemed to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimboBillyBubbaBob Donating Member (225 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. What!!??
Senator Chambliss has a plantation mentality. Let's kill the messenger is his message. The damage has been done. The company owners obviously want Mr. Graham gone but would not dare fire him at this juncture. Instead, let's get our servant Senator Chambliss to publicly browbeat the man. It's that mindset of "to hell with the workers, we can always get more." Purely disgraceful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olegramps Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
8. I believe that I would have been compelled to ask Chambliss:
In view of the fact that we were taken to war on lies that have resulted in the deaths of tens of thousands of people and maimed hundreds of thousands just why he hasn't resigned from the criminal political party that is responsible for this immoral catastrophe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SavageDem Donating Member (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. That was EXACTLY the response I was thinking would be apropro!
Nice comeback, gramps!

Completely off-topic, I loved the Irish brogue of Mr. Graham. I have some Irish stock in my genealogical history, but have lost the accent. Somehow weeded out in 100+ years of Americanization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buffynjody Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Also off topic
My guess is that Mr. Graham is a Scot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SavageDem Donating Member (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Ach, ye be right!
Boy, I hate when I do that. It makes me seem like such an...an...American! A loutish American that groups all British Isles' (and colonies') accents into one. I listened again, and concur with your assessment.

I, for some reason, make that mistake often. I try to do impersonations once in awhile, and can do a fair Irish brogue, but always struggle with the Scottish. It made me feel better the other day when I was listening to The Stephanie Miller Show and heard Jim Ward launch into a Scottish character - methinks it was his Sean Connery bit - with an Irish brogue. He pulled up short and had to restart with the right accent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
desktop Donating Member (263 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
9. When the government turns on the people....
It's time to make a change in government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wial Donating Member (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
10. seriously,
what is wrong with these people? I know a major factor of right wing power has always been its ability to cater to the adolescent glee of transgressive adolescent males, by getting away with intentionally abusive dishonest behavior (the Big Lie, the big pillage of the Treasury) but how could anyone look at a Chambliss and think anything but "what did I just step in?"

What delusional constituency thinks it is in their interest to support someone who tries to crush someone for trying to stop people from being burned to death? Do they think they are in the top 1% who will be harmed by whistle-blowers?

Is that the new focus-group-identified target of the GOP? Whistle-blowers, who are somehow responsible for our economic woes? Especially foreign whistle-blowers?

However, Chambliss' attack was so bizarre, a more likely scenario is even he wasn't convinced by the marching orders he received from his corporate handlers.

I once observed a State senate in session, debating a mining bill. The GOP senators would literally go to the back of the room to consult corporate lobbyist/aides because the geology was over their heads, and then come back and do what they were told. So maybe that's it.

Still got a funny smell on my shoe, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Welcome to DU!
love this "cater to the adolescent glee of transgressive adolescent males"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Welcome to DU, wial.
I loved your comment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zambero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
11. Notice how Chambliss refuses to make eye contact with the witness?
His demeanor says it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pberq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
12. updated story
Saxby is working on behalf of the company to keep victims from suing on behalf of dead or injured relatives.

http://savannahnow.com/node/618254

Chambliss says he doesn't have to obey order to testify in Imperial Sugar lawsuit

Larry Peterson | Sunday, November 16, 2008 at 12:30 am

Saxby Chambliss is resisting an order to give evidence in a lawsuit by families of victims killed or hurt in the Imperial Sugar Co. explosions and fire earlier this year.

The U.S. senator was subpoenaed last month on behalf of four victims - two dead and two injured - of the Feb. 7 Port Wentworth inferno that claimed the lives of 14 workers and hospitalized scores of others.

The conduct of Chambliss concerning the disaster has developed into an issue in his re-election campaign against Democrat Jim Martin. The incumbent outpolled Martin and a third candidate on Nov. 4 but failed to win a majority. Chambliss now faces runner-up Martin in a Dec. 2 runoff.

Savannah attorney Mark Tate, who issued the subpoena, said the Republican lawmaker tried to talk some of Tate's clients out of suing Imperial Sugar.

(more at link. . .)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
16. A very interesting connection in Imperial Sugar's social network.
http://www.imperialsugar.com/fw/main/Imperial_Sugar-929.html

The History of Imperial Sugar Company

The rich history of this company began in 1843, when Samuel May Williams' sugar crop on the Oakland Plantation (what is now Sugar Land, TX, the current headquarters of the Imperial Sugar Company) was large enough to justify the installation of a commercial raw sugar grinding mill (establishing the site of future Imperial Sugar Company). By 1855, in the surrounding areas of the Oakland Plantation, sugar cane had replaced cotton as the dominant crop. In the 1850's, Texas was producing more than enough sugar to satisfy its needs and the surplus was being shipped to Eastern and Southern cities. Sugar growing and milling was becoming big business and, by 1883, a 600-ton raw sugar mill was built and named the "Imperial Mill". In 1896, construction began of a cane sugar refinery at Sugar Land to manufacture 100,000 pounds per day of white refined sugar. The cost of construction required an investment of $1,500,000, a huge sum of money for that time.

--snip--


Sugar Land TX also happens to be the stomping grounds of Tom DeLay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC