Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Elizabeth Holtzman Calls for Impeachment-Bush and Cheney

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-03-07 07:39 AM
Original message
Elizabeth Holtzman Calls for Impeachment-Bush and Cheney
 
Run time: 09:02
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwiSyIbeYjI
 
Posted on YouTube: November 12, 2006
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: June 03, 2007
By DU Member: babylonsister
Views on DU: 973
 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-03-07 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Who is she?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-03-07 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. She's a VIP! From wiki...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Holtzman

Elizabeth Holtzman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Elizabeth Holtzman (born August 11, 1941 in Brooklyn, New York) is an American Democratic politician.

A graduate of Radcliffe College and Harvard Law School, she was the youngest woman ever to serve in Congress, elected at the age of 31. In 1972, she was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives for New York's 16th Congressional District, defeating—in the Democratic primary—Judiciary Committee chairman Emanuel Celler, a fifty-year incumbent and the House's longest serving member at that time. Later victorious in the November general election, she served from January of 1973 until January of 1981. During her tenure, Holtzman was considered a staunch liberal. She served on the House's Judiciary Committee during the impeachment hearings on the activities of President Richard Nixon in the summer of 1974. In 1978, her House Joint Resolution No. 638 was approved by the 95th Congress, which purported to extend the originally agreed-upon deadline for the state legislatures to ratify the proposed Equal Rights Amendment to the United States Constitution. She also served on the House Budget Committee and as Chairwoman of the House Immigration Subcommittee.

Holtzman was the Democratic candidate for the U.S. Senate in 1980, having defeated such luminaries as former Miss America Bess Myerson, former New York City Mayor John V. Lindsay, and Queens District Attorney John Santucci in the Democratic primary. She ran against Republican challenger Al D'Amato and incumbent Senator Jacob Javits on the Liberal Party ticket. Holtzman was narrowly defeated by D'Amato, a loss many observers attributed to Javits' splitting with her the liberal and Jewish votes.

In 1981, Holtzman made a comeback, winning election as District Attorney in Kings County (Brooklyn), a post she was reelected to in 1985. While district attorney, she formed new bureaus to focus on sex crimes and domestic violence, along with children's issues. She argued -- and won -- New York v. Burger, 482 U.S. 691 (1987), a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that warrantless administrative inspections can support criminal convictions in "closely regulated" industries. She won citywide office when she was elected New York City Comptroller in 1989. She has said that she first considered a race for Mayor of New York in 1989 before deciding to seek the comptroller's post instead. Holtzman viewed the comptroller's post as an extension of her work in Congress and as district attorney.

In 1992, Holtzman sought the Democratic nomination to again challenge D'Amato; she lost the primary to New York Attorney General Robert Abrams, who was himself defeated by the Republican incumbent in the November general election. This was a bitter primary in which Holtzman faced not only Abrams, but former Representative and 1984 vice presidential candidate Geraldine Ferraro. Holtzman finished fourth in the primary, behind Abrams, and the Rev. Al Sharpton. Accusations were raised about Holtzman's association with Fleet Bank, charges which came back to haunt her in 1993 when she was defeated in an attempt to retain her office as Comptroller. The Senate race was marked by a high amount of rancor in the debates with Holtzman frequently sparring with Ferraro on ethics issues.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-03-07 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
a nine minute primier on Impeachment, how we do it, why we do it. I'm posting this little gem on my impeachment group forum. Thank you for posting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rydz777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-03-07 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. I used to think impeachment was a waste of time, that it
would use up energy that our Democratic Congress could better spend in cutting war funding and setting timetables. But since they seem to have abandoned that project, it seems to me that they now have plenty of time to pursue impeachment. It only takes a majority vote in the House to impeach (although 2/3 in the Senate to convict.)

There is now another reason to impeach. David Brook (NYT) reported on Newshour last Friday that a White House source told him, "Bush feels liberated by his unpopularity." In other words, he has nothing to lose and can be just as reckless as he wants.

Bush is now like the guy who wrote on the mirror in the mens' room, "Stay my hand before I strike again!." So, impeach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-03-07 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. If GWBush is not impeached,
It is a stain on American democracy. If he isn't impeached, might as well take the articles out of laws, because it means that people who actively work for the destruction of the country won't be called to account.

It is time, IMHO, to take the whole discussion out of America and into the Hague.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redacted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-03-07 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thanks again babylonsister!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
7. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC